Replies

I beginning to think the “affair” is simply cover for the real reason they were conspiring.

From the article…. “That means Justice has decided to allow Congress to see just 7,000 of a total of 50,000 Strzok-Page texts – slightly less than 15 percent of the total number of texts the Justice Department has now. Why is that? Justice Department officials point to a Jan. 19 letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd to Capitol Hill investigators explaining which texts would and would not be turned over….."The department is not providing text messages that were purely personal in nature," Boyd wrote.”

I suppose some of the remaining 43,000 emails not turned over plus the ones from the Dec. 14, 2016 to May 17, 2017 time period going through the recovery process will also show that it was an ‘affair’ whatever that means. What is unthinkable about this is that an ‘affair’ seems to be granted some status of relationship privilege as if this was like a husband-wife relationship.

Clearly, the messages we’ve not seen are the sexts that they would have been sending to each other.

I am pretty sure I don’t want to see his “dick” pics.

I also have no desire to humiliate his wife any more than has already happened.

Unlike the Dems, we have some decency.

What is unthinkable about this is that an ‘affair’ seems to be granted some status of relationship privilege as if this was like a husband-wife relationship.

Absolutely! All of those texts are the property of the US taxpayers. There should be no notion of "privacy" involved.