Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbuck
The bigger question is why he didn’t also indict Hillary and her dossier Democrats.

Hello, they were political allies and funneled millions to each other. Sure, during the election they could criticize each other to the nth degree. That only helped each other's fundraising. Criticism is fine. They just couldn't use the inside dirt they had on each other, because that meant mutually assured destruction. And that remains today. They can still bash each other, just not use inside info. Trump couldn't afford to indict her..

10 posted on 02/19/2018 10:21:03 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Something that is dawning on me and it reassures me to see you use the words “mutually assured destruction”. We are all wondering what is keeping Sessions “on the porch”. Strzoks remarks about “insurance policy” begin to make sense. Not saying what it is but it is becoming apparent by the day that 0bama has something.


17 posted on 02/20/2018 2:32:48 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson