Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ironman
I'll confess to not being up to speed on the details. I don;t recall Nunes making any argument or statement about "start of the investigation in July 2016," but even if he did, of course he would not associate that with evidence that didn't exist until months later.

Schiff's first bullet makes me wonder if the Clinton dossier wasn't part of the justification to snoop on the Trump campaign in July 2016, then what was?

68 posted on 02/24/2018 2:16:20 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Nothing was.

Schiff’s memo claims Isikoff’s report in Yahoo news gave probable cause but Schiff fails to mention that Isikoff publicly declared that Steele’s Clinton-funded dossier was the source of his report.

Schiff’s memo indicts the people behind it. It is damning to the Clinton camp. They would have been smart to never have released it. What they gain is an insignificant amount of liar-media shoring. But a Special Prosecutor won’t care about the liar-media. Once the SP is involved and gathers evidence, charges of treason. sedition and conspiracy will emerge.


85 posted on 02/24/2018 2:27:50 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson