Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robroys woman
In this case, the DHS created a system where certain people in the country were allowed to apply for deferred action.

The system established by DHS did not have an expiration date.

The deferred action to each applicant had an expiration date, so accepted applicants were required to renew "deferred action" (a sort of imunity/work permit arrangement) periodically.

The system is now split into two parts. The new applicant part is gone. The renewal part lives on, per court order.

158 posted on 02/26/2018 9:33:32 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

In this case, the DHS created a system where certain people in the country were allowed to apply for deferred action.

The system established by DHS did not have an expiration date.

The deferred action to each applicant had an expiration date, so accepted applicants were required to renew “deferred action” (a sort of imunity/work permit arrangement) periodically.

The system is now split into two parts. The new applicant part is gone. The renewal part lives on, per court order.


That last part is reassuring. So no new applications will happen, is that what you are saying, just so I am clear? Least I read there were about 670,000 registered DACA-ites sill in the US. So all the non-registered ones cannot register, and are fair game for deportation, then.


177 posted on 02/26/2018 10:59:19 AM PST by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson