Parents’ petition declares ‘no confidence’ in transgender principal

Boston Globe ^ | 3/2/2018

[txrefugee]

Why are children being subjected to a mentally ill principal? It is tragic for parents to have to explain this bizarre behavior to young children.

[wbill]

No, I believe that the media called him, "Brave", "Courageous", and "Empowered". Trumpets blared, and parents cheered as he triumphantly entered the school, imparting knowledge upon the grateful children, who showered his path with rose petals as he strode confidently through the halls.

Reality? Most of the parents said, "This guy has issues. Keep him away from my kid." Guy gets put on indefinite leave, and slinks out the back door, likely never to return. But that doesn't support the media narrative.

I feel sorry for his wife and kids.

[Howie66]

As long as his DNA shows him to be male, he IS a he. A pervert, degenerate and a deviant, to be certain, with NO legitimate reason to be anywhere near children.

[B-Rizzle Fo-Shizzle]

[mykroar]

After quitting drinking in November,

My advise is to drink heavily.

[generally]

New theory:

This guy is going to use “mental incompetence” to avoid being prosecuted for some crime that is about to be exposed and is laying the groundwork for that now.

[Pearls Before Swine]

“It’s always paid leave.”

That’s just ridiculous. Even the Ma. parents of Swampscott can’t stand this fool.

[Mashood]

Parents should hook him up to the pickup truck and teach him what “drag” really means.

[Kozak]

“After quitting drinking in November, Daniels began dressing female more often at home, buying more women’s clothes, and joined a transgender support group.”
Somebody buy him some liquor...

[napscoordinator]

“The purpose of hiring a “trans” principal is to force the kids to accept the deviancy”.

Good grief read the article. They did not hire a transgender. They hired a guy to do the job and a few days ago showed up as a women.

[bk1000]

This is good. All we (normal deplorables) have to do is to continue to refuse to accept this nonsense. Refuse to let the insane raise your children. Refuse to give perverts access to them. Refuse them safe haven. Do not accept them.

[hal ogen]

Don’t let this mentally ill person near children. Who knows what will (has) happen???

[Saltmeat]

If I began daily dressing like Abe Lincoln and told everyone that I was Abe Lincoln, I would be dubbed insane—rightly so. This man is mentally disturbed, and should never be allowed to work around children again.

[Southern_Republican]

IT looks like Mr. Lippman from Seinfeld.

[Yogafist]

Even calling him “It” is falling into their trap. He is a male regardless of the degree of mutilation or the extent of chemical intervention. A deeply disturbed male, who has been encouraged to let his instability manifest by a militant and vocal minority who have forced rational thinking people into silence.

[airborne]

Oh I don’t know.

I think its reaction to actually being referred to as “IT” would be something special!

[Yogafist]

On second thought, calling him “it” instead of the correct pronoun is probably more derogatory. So I’m in.

[dsrtsage]

“On second thought, calling him “it” instead of the correct pronoun is probably more derogatory.”

Actually, I think “it” is the perfect solution to the “personal pronoun problem”. Spread it far and wide!

[longfellowsmuse]

Good for the parents, there is still hope, even in MA.

[goodnesswins]

oh....my....