Posted on 03/06/2018 8:44:50 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Good. This is where the blame lies, not with the NRA.
Add the Florida Democrat party to that lawsuit also.
Why send a threatening letter? Just sue the bastards. Let them be served out of the blue.
A good judge wont let the Broward crooks hide anything
In Broward? Now thats funny
No that Obama pal the Board of Ed guy.
He was instrumental in implementing the Promise Program that allowed Cruz to possess firearms and walk the street
Yep, years ago they ruled that the police ARE NOT responsible for your safety.
First they need to find a good judge, I doubt they want to take this mess through discovery. It would likely lead to additional lawsuits.
Sue them personally. Make them S-— themselves.
Great, keep posting every where that you can get the word out to the uninformed.
I saw in another post that BSO is sitting on 800 million that was to be used for security at the schools.
Obama pal may have been Arne Duncan
And that is exactly how they were trained to behave by the very public education system they watched get shot up.
Public education creates good little mindless drones who can't think for themselves and only do what they are told to.
>The USSC has put those who probably failed worst beyond suing.
Oh, I’d LOVE to see this go all the way up, so 9 black-robed tyrants can attempt to pretzel-logic how govt officials, bending/breaking the Law and failing to do their JOB, still retain the privileges and immunity of said job.
I say, PLEASE, let that political sh!t-storm come. Talk about an eye *opener* for J. Q. Public
Broward taxpayers get ready to get reamed out due to Democrat and liberal cowardice and idiocy in the Sheriff and School departments.
Bttt.
5.56mm
>
USSC has already ruled to protect and serve is not part of the job.
>
Does that include the school board/school turning a blind eye? The cops refusing to SQUAT after 39+ calls? The FBI not following up?
Fine, the cop(s) *didn’t* have to show up, nor go in.
Since Rights were infringed (from lawfully carrying), do they not also assume the liability for the same (IE: providing security @ every sports-game, courthouse, etc.)? Sorry, but you can’t have both.
Yes. Its called the public duty doctrine. There is a special relationship exception, but it is narrow.
I firmly believe that the insane Obama policy described at the below link is chief among the many failed policies of the left wing that led directly to this shooting:
https://www.redstate.com/slee/2018/03/05/connection-parkland-shooting-obama-administration-policies/
Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.