[saywhatagain]

Not particularly addressed to you, however you inserted a concept I was going to address from the article.

Madcow states . . . "Should I take that to mean that this might be particularly risky or even an unwise move?”

What is the risk? In all my years, since when does a President come face-to-face unless an agreement has already been made? No risk to meet.

Having said that . . . One could use the Reagan Gorbachev Reykjavik summit as an example of a "rougue" leader changing the conditions. Reagan walked out . . . and the rest as they say is history.

Personally, I see no risk. win-win is all I see. But thats my opinion, and its the only one I have

[babble-on]

Well NOT all the details have been decided between the US and Norkland. Nothing has been decided. We have no idea what that peculiar little creep is up to. He was shooting off ICBMs now he wants peace? Do you trust him?

So there’s a lot of risk indeed. This is no signing ceremony, it’s a rodeo.

[Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi]

My mom and I were discussed this earlier and is concerned that the Norks are tricking us like the Japanese did prior to Pearl Harbor.