Notice the logic the judge ruled “reporting a person transgender not injurious.” You have to fully buy into the latest “gender” nonsense to believe public discussion of your sexual organs is not injurious. Especially for a person who has likely had to deal with persistent rumors about his sexuality. Not being a judge I would think the obvious malice would be proof enough of injury.
It depends on the audience. Falsely reporting that somebody is a Trump supporter would not be injurious in most places in Texas, but might get you killed in Oakland, California. Simmons' business is national in nature.