Hey!
You’re assessment of Sessions is very intriguing to me. Would you please explain your thinking further?
I guess you would consider me one of those with whom you consider my intellect to be deficient.
“You’re assessment of Sessions is very intriguing to me. Would you please explain your thinking further?”
Actually, I was repeating the thought of another FReeper with whom I happen to agree. The other poster opined that Sessions does what his staff tells him he needs to do. They told him ( the “they” would be the Office in the DOJ that assessed McCabe’s wrongdoing, and said that he needed to be fired for his “lack of candor, i.e. lying to Congress when he was under oath), so since they told him what he needed to do, he did it. So much to say, if had NOT fired McCabe, he would have been going against his staff’s recommendation which was based on their investigation.
As to your other response, which was directed to someone other than yourself, I guess if you can continue to convince yourself that Sessions is something other than what the current evidence suggests. you can join him. My view is that that thought process is what gets us elected officials who, are, at the end of the day, ineffective or worse, when anyone reviewing the facts with an open mind can clearly see that they are not really who or what they claim to be.
I am to the point where I am convinced that Sessions is a GOPE mole, a gift from the Senate “leadership” sent in to undermine President Trump. It’s either that or it’s simply “his get up and go has done gone and went!” I’d like to believe I’m wrong, but the evidence doesn’t take me there.
“You’re assessment of Sessions is very intriguing to me. Would you please explain your thinking further?”
Actually, I was repeating the thought of another FReeper with whom I happen to agree. The other poster opined that Sessions does what his staff tells him he needs to do. They told him ( the “they” would be the Office in the DOJ that assessed McCabe’s wrongdoing, and said that he needed to be fired for his “lack of candor, i.e. lying to Congress when he was under oath), so since they told him what he needed to do, he did it. So much to say, if had NOT fired McCabe, he would have been going against his staff’s recommendation which was based on their investigation.
As to your other response, which was directed to someone other than yourself, I guess if you can continue to convince yourself that Sessions is something other than what the current evidence suggests, you can join him. My view is that that thought process is what gets us elected officials who, are, at the end of the day, ineffective or worse, when anyone reviewing the facts with an open mind can clearly see that they are not really who or what they claim to be.
I am to the point where I am convinced that Sessions is a GOPE mole, a gift from the Senate “leadership” sent in to undermine President Trump. It’s either that or it’s simply “his get up and go has done gone and went!” I’d like to believe I’m wrong, but the evidence doesn’t take me there.