McMasters was hired for particular talents he has which were appropriate to the job he was hired to do. The contract ended when the task was accomplished and a different set of talents was required. McMasters’ ideological proclivities are irrelevant and did not come into play during his tenure. One reason you don’t keep employees on past the completion of the assigned task is that, when their needed particular expertise is no longer needed their other talents and liabilities come into play and they become disruptive and cause failures. That is why the high turnover in this administration. People are hired for particular tasks to which their talents are suited. When the task is done the contract is up. It is not the same as firing people. You don’t “fire” the contractor when he finishes reroofing your house. His contract is at an end.
Yes....... no ruts allowed in the road going forward