The whole POINT of these things were to eliminate HUMAN ERROR.
Now that the advocates know the machines can error, now tehy will get off their high-horse.
One today. Fill the highways with them, and there will be more.
A) There was no human error, unless it was error on the pedestrian’s part. Thus goal accomplished.
B) No one said there wouldn’t be some machine error. Just that it would likely be less than human error and would improve over time.
C) I”m an advocate and one accident which was likely the pedestrian’s fault will hardly silence me.
D) Yes when everything is automated there will be more accidents due to automation. But total accidents will decrease as the decrease in human error will more than offset the increase in machine error.
Who knew a computer chip could fail? Sure, how may times a day does a computer of iphone freeze up or gets wonky?