You’re wrong about pretty much everything you wrote. After re-reading actually you’re wrong about everything you wrote. I mean from start to finish. Amazing.
I’m willing to listen to disagreement, so why don’t you take the time to actually address me point by point rather than taking the lazy route? You sway no one with your “everything you say is wrong’ non-argument.
No, I’m not an expert in this area but I do know that there are existing state and federal statues that restrict automatic weapons in some form - statues that have never been overturned by the courts. To the extent that the ban on bump stocks conforms to existing federal law, it is not new law per se but enforcement of existing law. That’s my main point. If you don’t like the bump stock ban, then fight the underlying federal law.
It must be painful to be that ignorant.