Posted on 04/03/2018 2:56:30 AM PDT by Chickensoup
Probably one of the most lucid articles on the takeover by Muslims (Moslims) in the West. I recommend it:
Why are so many Western Christians either silent about, or actually complicit in, the Muslim hegira to the West? One would think Christians would be at the forefront of opposition. Some are, but most are not, and these latter include Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans, mainline Protestants, and evangelicals in America. These churches have made four claims...
...Samuel Huntington, too, understood this. In his Clash of Civilizations (1996) he wrote, The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism but Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power. Despairing of ever catching up with the West, they have determined to capture it from within. Thereby, as if by magic, Western wealth, power, and preeminence become their own, without their doing anything other than migrating and reproducing.
Why are so many Western Christians either silent about, or actually complicit in, the Muslim hegira to the West? One would think Christians would be at the forefront of opposition. Some are, but most are not, and these latter include Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans, mainline Protestants, and evangelicals in America. These churches have made four claims...
...Samuel Huntington, too, understood this. In his Clash of Civilizations (1996) he wrote, The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism but Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power. Despairing of ever catching up with the West, they have determined to capture it from within. Thereby, as if by magic, Western wealth, power, and preeminence become their own, without their doing anything other than migrating and reproducing.
I am not silent by any means , the evil cult of Islam is not to be tolerated in any way shape or form. Let these subhuman animals fight amongst themselves as they have since this abomination rose its ugly satanic head . If this offends you maybe you needed to be offended.
Great post. Huffington was one who saw the danger. I lived for many years in the Middle East. Most Western Christians have no idea. These people are intent upon conquering the “infidel.” And dragging Western culture down to the hellhole that is the Muslim world. Yes, individual Muslims may be honerable people - I knew many! But they are in the grip of a dangerous and violent ideology that they dare not question. Some of those who advocated peace were dragged out of their homes and butchered.
The article details their ways of thinking, and frankly that is the what can be used against them.
One would think Christians would be at the forefront of opposition.
One would have thought that about Godless schools, no-fault divorce, the pill, the sexual revolution, feminism, abortion, illicit drugs and Sodomite marriage, too.
God help America.
No, wait...America, go back to God.
bkmk
When I started reading this article, a thought came to me:
If the West had adopted today’s attitude toward Muslims 100’s of years ago, the Crusades would never have happened. The Muslims would have won.
There have been others that have extensively written on this and other concerning matters. Walid Shoebat - God’s War on Terror: Islam, Prophecy, and the Bible (2008).
>>One would have thought that about Godless schools, no-fault divorce, the pill, the sexual revolution, feminism, abortion, illicit drugs and Sodomite marriage, too.
The headline almost answers the question. It should read Progressive Christianity and not Religious Left. Because you cant be Progressive and truly Christian, and they choose the former. Once they do that, everything is acceptable to them.
I disagree on your wording, not the idea you are trying to convey.
Leftists should never be referred to as progressives, that is their word of choice.
They are leftists, with all that it means, death camps, destruction and killings.
>>Leftists should never be referred to as progressives, that is their word of choice.
>>They are leftists, with all that it means, death camps, destruction and killings.
You are wrong. As we have learned in the past 2 years, Progressives exist in the Left and the Right sides of our political spectrum. The Progressive movement was started by a Republican. The first Progressive President was Teddy Roosevelt. It is demonstrates a dangerous ignorance of history to assign Progressivism to one side.
Progressivism is an ideology that comes from Humanism and Existentialism. It is not a subset of Leftism, but they occupy a lot of the same ground ideologically. But it is wholly opposite from Theistic Christianity (as opposed to Progressive Christianity, which is not Christianity at all). While radical Leftism is an act of violence and can be fought with violence, Progressivism is slow death by cancer. Please take time to understand what you are talking about. Believe me, using Progressive to describe them is far better than a collection of other words that they can refute. Then, we only have to educate the public about what that one word REALLY means.
The “Religious” Left?
“They are leftists, with all that it means, death camps, destruction and killings.”.....
Seems a contradictory word or two in there somewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.