Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
"The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional rights to ‘bear arms,’" U.S. District Judge William Young wrote in a decision Thursday

Well now, wait.

In the original Heller case, the charges had to do with a sawed-off shotgun and the government lied to the court saying they were NOT "weapons of war" because they had never been issued to troops (a demonstrable lie) and were not covered by 2A.
Defense didn't show up so the notion was not challenged in court.

2A is specifically about weapons of war.

This pissant "judge" just turned 2A on its head.

87 posted on 04/07/2018 4:52:57 AM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grobdriver

The gun grabbing judge can now try to send his jack booted thugs in to collect the guns. I predict a lot of dead jack booted thugs.


88 posted on 04/07/2018 4:55:33 AM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson