FReepers want to look at facts and judge for themselves.
For instance: I would like to introduce this web site: as an example of how to handle these kinds of discussion.
This particular site is about the Ghouta atrocity. There's been plenty of time for the dust to settle, for fresh data to come out and for analyists to add value.
This is a level of analysis that obviously hasn't had a chance to occur since Douma.
Now, obviously I'm introducing the Ghouta page because it backs up my argument. But it's also a model for how to carry out these discussions, and how to introduce and deprecate evidence and argument from both sides.
No more Warren Reports.
I read it. I do not trust its credibility or “facts” over Mattis, etc. (For example, the claim the Assad regime has only used non-lethal chem weapons on only military targets, previously, is just absurd.)
So, ok, you believe Trump, Mattis, etc., are lying. I don’t. We’ll have to leave it at that — I have lengthy tax filings yet to complete. (Ugh.)
Oh, one last thing - as I was closing out web pages (links to the site you referenced), I hit the “about” page for the page author “sasa wawa”, scrolled down a bit, and found among others along for the ride, Cindy Sheehan.
https://plus.google.com/112074087345931970053
Ok...