[b]What i don’t understand is, why can’t these supposedly brilliant lawyers representing the cases word their arguments more precisely so that they don’t get thrown out or ruled against? What are the lawyers getting paid the big bucks for if they bring stuff that is ‘too vague’?[/b]
It was not the lawyers’ arguments that were found to be too vague. It was the underlying statute. This is the fault of congress, not the lawyers arguing in front of the court. Congress made the drafting errors.
thanks for clearing that up- I thought it was trump’s lawyers bringing it to the supreme court because federal judges were trying to block his immigration policy