He was massively outnumbered with 5 people harrumphing each other; so he nodded knowingly after most of the points the idiots made.
I would’ve hoped that Jordan would’ve pointed out that the support of Trump is mostly about support for the Constitution and the return to its precepts after having seen it shredded for 8 years.
If you’re going to go on a show that resembles the conversations in Alice in Wonderland, at least overturn the tables at their stupid tea party.
It all comes down to the choice — “Rule of Law” or “Rule of Men”.
One way leads to a republic (which is what we are) and one way leads to oligarchy (rule by the elite).
The side that respects the Constitution and wants to enforce existing law is the American side. The side that the media/globalists are on should be called un-American to its face because they do not respect our laws.
Exactly right. The core issue of “a constitutional republic under the rule of law” vs “an oligarchy under the rule of men” needs to be brought up again and again.
Peterson seemed to concede to them the point that Trump is an embarrassing buffoon and so his followers are to be pitied and a way found to gently bring them to the light. Really, that’s what the panel shaped his comment into and he agreed with them. He looked ill-informed and weak.
I was very disappointed.