NOTE: DC says that according to WaPo Kelly discussed the issue with Trump, who sided with the intelligence officials.Nunes claimed that they are using national security as an excuse to not allow congressional oversight. Maybe Judicial Watch will make a statement.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
WaPo ... waste of time reading.
2 posted on
05/09/2018 12:02:42 PM PDT by
Freee-dame
(Best election ever!)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
It’s probably Brennan or Clapper or Susan Rice. More CYA.
3 posted on
05/09/2018 12:03:56 PM PDT by
dirtboy
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
FTA: Nunes threatened to hold Attorney General Jeff Sessions in contempt of Congress for failing to provide the documents on Sunday.
<<<>>>
That is like double secret probation.
5 posted on
05/09/2018 12:07:30 PM PDT by
Joe Bfstplk
(A Texas Deplorable.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
um congress has a right to see the info in their capacity of oversight..how can they determine if the info is correctly decided as national security without seeing it? catch 22?
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
“NOTE: DC says that according to WaPo Kelly discussed the issue with Trump, who sided with the intelligence officials.”
Yeah, let Nunes Hang in the Breeze Donald, Winning!
10 posted on
05/09/2018 12:09:46 PM PDT by
heights
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
In the words of Church Lady: “How convenient. . . .”
11 posted on
05/09/2018 12:11:21 PM PDT by
RatRipper
(Unindicted co-conspirators: the Mainstream Media and the Democratic Party)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
It’s some kid in Momma’s basement on her computer.
It would be totally embarrassing to out them.
13 posted on
05/09/2018 12:11:37 PM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Why does Nunes waste his time when all Donald Does is whine and not have his back!
16 posted on
05/09/2018 12:12:56 PM PDT by
heights
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Why issue a warning to a separate branch of government?
17 posted on
05/09/2018 12:13:03 PM PDT by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
It was an analyst at a “Five Eyes” partner. They have complete immunity to spy on us with abandon and we route access to everything to them for review.
It gets completely around our quaint laws requiring court orders or search warrants.
It’s obscene.
18 posted on
05/09/2018 12:16:21 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Mueller: YOU WILL APPEAR WHEN I WISH, WHERE I WISH, TRUMP!
Kelly: YOU MAY NOT INTERVIEW WITNESSES, TRUMP!
I am writing an editorial about all this.
Shortly.
22 posted on
05/09/2018 12:27:02 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(What America needs is more Hogg control.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Criminal coverup by the silent coup.
Citing ‘national security’ as reason for not naming the source of info being used to remove an elected president is highly queer er... Irregular
The whole nature of the case itself is ‘national security’ isn’t it? Yet Hitlery Rotten Clinton leaked priviledged State Dept information to her own civilian daughter about the Benghazi terrorist attack on 9-11-2012 while she persisted in lying to Congress and the media for weeks afterwards blaming it on a youtube video. Hillary even lied to the mouring families.
23 posted on
05/09/2018 12:28:55 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Ads for Chappaquiddick warn of scenes of tobacco use. What about the hazards of drunk driving?)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Probably Clinton associate Sid Vicious.
24 posted on
05/09/2018 12:31:57 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Star Chamber "justice".
25 posted on
05/09/2018 12:32:45 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Susan Rice
She doesn’t want to go to prison. And is cooperating.
She’s already been thrown under the bus, more than once, by the Obamites.
JMHO.
26 posted on
05/09/2018 12:33:17 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
No problem. If it’s a secret source then the “evidence” cannot be admitted.
27 posted on
05/09/2018 12:34:38 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
"Justice Department and intelligence community officials issued a stark warning to the White House..." When are we going to stark seeing the more correct thing....
"White House issues stark warning to Justice Dept and Intelligence community....
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
IF Kelley presented it Trump, and IF he didn’t spin it.
Two big ifs.
30 posted on
05/09/2018 12:47:42 PM PDT by
Basket_of_Deplorables
(President Trump: Please Fire Sessions!!! You have nothing to lose.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
WaPo reported Justice Department and intelligence community officials issued a stark warning to the White House on May 2 against a request from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes. Nunes had submitted a subpoena to the Justice Department on April 24 for records related to the Russia probe.
Why would they issue a warning to the WH vice the Senate?
31 posted on
05/09/2018 12:51:32 PM PDT by
Garvin
(Always remember folks, kill a commie for mommy ~ Semper Fi, Mac!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson