1 posted on
05/17/2018 8:43:09 PM PDT by
caww
To: caww
2 posted on
05/17/2018 8:47:46 PM PDT by
SteveH
To: caww
I have to admit, Mr. Zinke has been a pleasant surprise. He’s turned out to be a pretty good Secretary of Interior.
To: caww
Seems one of our brainiacs in the Federal government could have figured this out, say about 1960.
4 posted on
05/17/2018 8:52:05 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
To: caww
This has long been an issue with the Feds, especially the DoD.
Many reports over the years on what to do about Strategic materials.
6 posted on
05/17/2018 8:56:36 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: caww
I think the idea would be to import as much of these elements as possible from outside sources.
This has two effects. One, we draw down the foreign suppliers, and two, this puts these elements into the domestic scrap/recycling stream.
Primary extraction and refining of these elements is a very expensive and energy intensive process. So, let the chicoms burn out all their resources.
The post consumer scrap stream recycling of these elements is a much energy intensive process. Make the chicoms greed do the heavy lifting.
8 posted on
05/17/2018 9:07:57 PM PDT by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
To: caww
The list includes such valuable metals as aluminum and titanium, as well as uranium, helium, lithium, platinum, potash, and strontium. Uranium...where have I heard that word before??
16 posted on
05/17/2018 9:33:41 PM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: caww
Hey, how did we actually get smart people into these government positions?!
Ohhhh... “President Trump directed Zinke to conduct a review of the nation’s critical mineral assets and to create a strategy on how to handle vulnerabilities.”
— more winning —
17 posted on
05/17/2018 9:35:14 PM PDT by
deks
To: caww
Should lead to more streamlined mining on federal and other lands.
25 posted on
05/17/2018 11:14:45 PM PDT by
Revolutionary
("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
To: caww
It is just good stewardship to stay aware of our weaknesses, and have a plan to protect them.
If we depend on one country (e.g.China) for a critical input (e.g. rare earth minerals) which are essential for a broad category of industry (e.g. magnets for electric vehicles and railguns), then that country could cut us off during war (as China plans), or take over the businesses that use these materials, by denying them to competitors (as China has done).
27 posted on
05/17/2018 11:50:35 PM PDT by
BeauBo
To: caww
While we retool to extract the magic 35 here again in the USA, do you know who is rich in these that can give China a run for their money and they will need our Caterpillar dozers etc to get them going to extract the 6 to 10 Trillion dollars worth they are sitting on?
North Korea....
Let the multi-level chess winning of that sink in for a moment.
29 posted on
05/18/2018 2:43:30 AM PDT by
taildragger
("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
To: caww
30 posted on
05/18/2018 3:03:46 AM PDT by
FrdmLvr
To: caww
Uranium? Hillary Clinton is disappointed...President Hillary would sell those to terroristic nations...
35 posted on
05/18/2018 4:31:46 AM PDT by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
To: caww
Too late for Hillary’s uranium deal.
37 posted on
05/18/2018 5:13:51 AM PDT by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: caww
Too late for Hillary’s uranium deal.
38 posted on
05/18/2018 5:13:51 AM PDT by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: caww
Since aluminum is protected, shouldn’t we go back to tin beer cans?
41 posted on
05/18/2018 6:40:57 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: caww
42 posted on
05/18/2018 8:15:07 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(We're even doing the right thing for them. They just don't know it yet. --Donald Trump, CPAC '18)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson