Yellowstone isn’t in the Cascade Range, which was the subject of the list.
I re-read the article from SF Gate and it was actually talking about the volcanoes in California with the byline actually reading: “These are the California volcanoes most likely to erupt first” Yellowstone may not fall in that category but neither do many of the locations mentioned by the posters to include anything north of Medicine Lake and the Soda Lake identification in Nevada.
I grew up in the San Joaquin Valley of California near the Cascades and have visited many of the places mentioned. And I can look out my window right now and see Mt. Ranier, kinda, without the clouds, from my home south of Tacoma. But my point was that the locations they are mentioning are fire crackers compared to the dynamite sitting under Yellowstone. A few thousands will die if they go up. A few hundreds of thousands will go if/when Yellowstone goes. And if one or two of the smaller locations go, it won’t have any where near the effect across the nation of the Yellowstone caldera. It will be earth effecting with the destruction it will do to our food systems, trade, and way of life for many years.
rwood