It’s settled.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649
PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. ELG. ELG v. PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/325
14th Amendment
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
Chief Justice Waite re: Minor vs Happersett
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/88/162
Nothing you cite changes to whom was given the power to create a ‘natural born’ US citizen. Neither Congress or the judicial branch can give or remove ‘natural born’ US citizenship. We the people are government.