Posted on 05/25/2018 6:47:00 AM PDT by rktman
The people who are best described as members of a renewable energy cult are lately promoting the idea that we should run the country on 100% renewable energy, whatever that is. I say "whatever that is" because different branches of the cult have different definitions of renewable energy. It seems to be a matter of fashion and prejudice.
One definition of renewable energy is that it is naturally replenished on a human timescale. Solar energy and wind energy fit in nicely with that definition. Most fans of renewable energy explicitly reject renewable hydroelectricity if it involves damming a river. Most renewable energy-lovers are also dam-haters. They literally feel that fish are more important than people.
Global warming, which supposedly is caused by emissions of CO2 from burning fossil fuels, is frequently cited as a justification for using renewable energy. But hydro and nuclear, energy that does not emit CO2, is excluded from the renewable universe.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
There is no such thing as renewable energy.
Cheap batteries will help, but liquid transportation fuel will always be required for shipping and aviation and military use.
The short is not without massively subsidizing the whole thing. At best, all the renewables generate a small amount of net energy, after paying for the energy needed to create infrastructure. Unless we can overcome the third law of dynamics and keep the stuff around forever, it will never pay for itself.
Depends on your timeline for renewal.
Oil is renewable if you care to wait long enough.
Solar isn’t renewable in that the Sun will eventually run out of Hydrogen to fuse.
“One definition of renewable energy is that it is naturally replenished on a human timescale.”
Many Natural gas fields, that have been pumped dry and capped, have been know to fully replenish in 30 years.
“Trees too are more important than people.”
I remember the “save the trees” switch from paper bags to plastic.
Now the Pacific ocean is a sea of plastic bags.
My guess is the whole movement was for and by oil companies as a way to process refinery waste into plastic bags.
There is no such thing as renewable energy.
Thermodynamics arent just a good idea. Theyre laws.
L
> Is 100 Percent Renewable Energy Possible? <
Sure, if you don’t mind living in a tent and giving up all forms of transportation more advanced than a bicycle.
“Cheap batteries will help”
No they won’t. You still have to use fuel to charge them...
Sorry, that just doesn’t happen. It takes thousands if not millions of years for the hydrocarbons to migrate from the source rock to the trap.
Not without a rabbi and a live chicken
Cardboard is the largest volume of any domestic trash. My town’s transfer station has two dumpsters for Cardboard. One dumpster for all other materials. It is very easy to recycle and turn back into more cardboard or brown paper bags. Most bags are 100% recycled paper now.
On another note: Sawdust as a byproduct of producing lumber is increasingly being made into wood pellets for use in pellet stoves and electricity generation especially in Europe. Wood pellets are being used to replace coal as a fuel for their boilers.
Funny...I just realised that the same people who can’t understand the law of supply and demand don’t understand the laws of thermodynamics either! They believe the laws don’t apply to them! LOL!
It’s possible, certainly, if one returns to a pre-industrial lifestyle that discards such luxuries as electricity, indoor plumbing, telephones, central heating, etc. Let’s all just huddle in the dark around a fire fueled by the best renewable energy source: wood. Better yet, let the morons who keep pushing this Luddite nonsense set the example by moving into caves and shutting the f*** up.
We have a ranch in SE Oklahoma, with a wood burning stove for heat in the house. 2100 sqft house. We heat the house on firewood all winter when we are there, and we never cut down a tree. We have 125 acres with about 25 acres having cattle, and 100 acres of dense trees (Hardwood and pines) and a creek and a few beaver ponds. We just cut up trees that fall. Big trees small ones. Storms take them out, or they just get old and fall. We can't keep it all cut up and cleaned out. And if you walk through there there are thousands of small trees that nature has sewn coming up to replace the big ones that are falling.
Yes with hydrogen and solar etc
You can run transportation including jets with hydrogen
Hygrogen can be made from water
Now look I did my thesis on this in the 90s
It’s still about 50-100 years off
Lots of.gas and oil and uranium left
Also we need larger steady sources of power for now and for industrial
Batteries are also getting better
Most of the distributed renewables are for supporting the grid for now
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.