Sarah Sanders didn’t run to a court to sue for the Red Hen to be forced to serve her. She publicized what they did, and is letting the market take it from there. Far cry from using the might of government to force a Christian baker to make a homosexual wedding cake.
Nice deconstruction.
I don’t know that Sarah even publicized the event. Correct me if I’m wrong, but someone at the restaurant posted on social media a note from the restaurant’s kitchen bulletin board indicating that Sarah Sanders had been evicted from the restaurant. Sarah was asked to comment on that post; she did and confirmed that she was asked to leave.
>>>She publicized what they did<<<
Not really. She responded to being questioned about it.
Even then, she did not mention how the Owner assembled a Mob and followed her “Liberal” In-Laws when they decided to go to another Restaurant to eat a Meal.
Yes, the fools who own the Red Hen should be allowed to serve who they want to serve. BUT they are not exempt from the negative consequences of their dumbassedness. This is the beauty of the 1A. It allows us to recognize the idiots among us. No litigation necessary in this case. The court of public opinion is speaking for itself.
GReat response for reform and. Gay cake makers
GReat response for reform and. Gay cake makers
She didn’t publicize it. A Red Hen employee did that.
Both in the case of the cake and the florist, and Little Sisters of the Poor they were targeted by a vindictive, Godless, we are paying you back group.
Homosexual militants are on a mission to destroy. They will never back down, ever. They will eventually go to court to FORCE pastors to marry them, in their churches. The left wants Christians to be silenced and preferably dead.