Though the way liberals view things, once something is decided the way they want it decided, then it’s settled law.
So there’s no going back on abortion or homosexual marriage.
But anything that doesn’t get decided in the liberal direction is always something the liberals say should be revisited.
And they mean that at some future point, when liberals are in control, that’s when liberal judges will decide it and make it settled law.
Yes I know. It is just so much fun to cram “settled law” back at them
You are spot-on correct. Roe v. Wade, when viewed strictly as a legal precedent is widely considered the worst SC decision of the modern era. I don’t mean according to your opinion of abortion as a “choice”. I mean the judgement was made on the basis of things unrelated to the case such as a women’s “right to privacy”, etc.
I’m always amazed at how unprincipled and hypocritical, these democrats are. So, in 1996, Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, stating a marriage is only a man and a woman. Hillary and Obama agreed. Just 15 to 18 years later it was taken to the SC and Obama’s justice dept. did not defend it in court. They can turn their “principles” on a dime just depending on the direction the wind is blowing.
and cry that the court stole the election when ordered to certify the results
Laws against God's nature (double meaning) can not stand the test of time.