To: detective
Ok, Susan, so that means you would have loved Dred Scott.
7 posted on
07/02/2018 4:29:48 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(Free Republic has been reduced to primarily a gathering place for the inane, banal, and obtuse.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Bears repeating over and over again.
26 posted on
07/02/2018 4:47:21 PM PDT by
wiley
(John 16:33: "In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world.")
To: gov_bean_ counter
It could also mean this liberal dimwit wouldn’t mind if a very very late term abortion was performed on her.
40 posted on
07/02/2018 5:14:02 PM PDT by
Newtoidaho
(All I ask of living is to have no chains on me.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Yes, she should be asked is she saying that a Supreme Court should never overturn a prior decision? Then that specific question - what about Dred Scott ... then what about Plessy v Ferguson ... Roe v Wade said (laughably) the justices did not know when life begins ... has science since then been able to show (without a doubt) otherwise? Is a court’s decision that is factually incorrect as to its basic reasoning going to be allowed to stand on its ignorance / lie? If “yes” why?
52 posted on
07/02/2018 7:01:57 PM PDT by
Susquehanna Patriot
(Do Leftist/Liberals Really Believe That Dissent = Highest Form of Patriotism?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson