Posted on 07/12/2018 11:16:43 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
Peter Strzok testimony is set to reconvene at 2PM EST
You can watch it live here: Peter Strzok Live Testimony
Previous thread of the 10AM testimony:
Live coverage: FBI agent faces grilling on Capitol Hill - Peter Strzok (Part 1)
The GOP need to trip him up or this will end up being a nothing burger.
Clay... Thank you!
The problem we have with this is that the MSM is on the side of the Rats and Strzok/Deep State. The MSM will likely report this as Peter being a loyal protector of the USA, and suggest that he was only trying to keep us from a Putin-led POTUS. If they play that song often enough in the next few days, THAT will be the message that many normal people will take away from these hearings. JMHO
If I were Gowdy (and I don’t play him on TV), I’d continuously interrupt these posing Demwits with “Objection your honor, counsel is leading the witness” until Goodlatte either stops him or states, “Overruled. Continue counselor.”
It would make for some fine Perry Mason theatrics.
“I agree, with the exceptions of Radcliffe and Gowdy. They seemed prepared for this circus. “
Yeah.....kinda.
But only one level deep. They (Radcliffe & Gowdy-—I did not hear Radcliffe, only Gowdy) *DID* manage to fall into a couple of Dem traps they did not foresee very well. And I found that disappointing. Not Darrell Issa disappointing but disappointing nonetheless. I hope they can deliver the goods. Strzoks’ explanations for “no bias” were beyond ludicrous; but it is not a matter of ridiculing your deponent (questionee) —— you have to induce them to contradict themselves within their answers; and not with a 4-layer conundrum like Gowdy thinks he’s really clever putting together. For example, Gowdy never asked “how can an unbiased investigator fail to question the primary suspect in a criminal investigation?” Or perhaps”except in cases where the prime suspect was later found dead or could not be located, have you ever conducted or heard of an investigation where suspect #1 was not questioned?”
Changing the wording “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” I have always thought was perfectly meaningless from a probative standpoint. So asking Strzok when he did that is just asking to be driven off into the weeds with an entirely plausible “I don’t recall”. That, therefore, is not a skillful line of questioning. As far as I am concerned.
Read Jerry Spence. “Police State”...the DOJ and FBI have been corupt for thirty years..
90% conviction rate and most never go to trail..
They use entrapment and he lied to the FBI all the time..
Neither Trump nor I knew this until this little razzle dazzle of yours. Someone get the hook.
Naturally every station cuts away. Grrr...
I know it but they broke in with the Opening Cermony at Blenheim Palace and our BEAUTIFUL FIRST LADY LOOKS LIKE A PRINCESS IN THAT GORGEOUS DRESS!
Switched to Cspan on the computer and listening to the hearing with my headphones while I watch the ceremony.
LOVE our FLOTUS!!!
Yep, devious
Good grief, Hank Johnson. Hope there’s not too many people in the hearing room so it doesn’t tip over.
Isn’t this Hank Johnson the clown that said Cuba (or wherever he was referring to) was going to tip over?
And now Hank Johnson thinks russian collusion has reached a tipping point.(gurgle gurgle)
If this once great nation does go down, it will be because of corruption (dems) and cowardice (GOP). How sad.
Pray for our nation.
Oh man, another dim, and he sounds dumber than dirt. Might as well mute the tv until he shuts up.
—
Well, Hank Johnson’s the retard who thought that Guam would flip over if you put too many people on it.
But even then FakeNews would not run the soundbite.
Haven’t been able to listen for a while.
Have we actually learned anything new, or has this a whole lotta sound and fury signifying jack **** so far?
Fox youtube livecast didn't cut away. And King was also pounding on the messages on his private electronic devices. Those have to be golden. Numerous times when discussions between Strczok/Page got sensitive they referenced their Iphone accounts. Clearly asking him to review them on the part of the OIG was a free pass tothis criminal worm.
Subpoena them and charge him in contempt when he refuses.
Strzok? Blatant arrogant liar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.