Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The former candidate proposed that the US should teach the rest of the world to embrace diversity. 'We should be a model for how a big, diverse, pluralistic society thrives together. Our diversity is one of our strongest assets in the 21st century. And change is always hard. I understand that.'

'For those who want to turn the clock back on that and say somehow that has hurt America, they just are not walking around with their eyes open, they are living in a very narrow understanding of what has already made us great.'

Clinton also weighed in on Trump's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, following Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement announcement earlier this month. 'The potential replacement of Justice Kennedy is so consequential for those human rights, for women's rights, for LGBT rights,' she said.

1 posted on 07/22/2018 5:26:58 AM PDT by sevinufnine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: sevinufnine

If Hillary truly believes Putin is so “dangerous”, I have one word for her which can also be used as a question to her:

Uranium (?)


2 posted on 07/22/2018 5:28:15 AM PDT by sevinufnine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Also notice her true concern is not “turning back the clock” on abortion, LGBT rights, and issues rather than JOBS, economy, our national debt, getting rid of the disaster that’s Obamacare, reducing the treat of nuclear war, etc. Nope..just the issues which are the icing on the liberals’ little cupcakes.


3 posted on 07/22/2018 5:30:27 AM PDT by sevinufnine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

That this woman is still not in prison drives me nuts. Until she is locked up we will never have equal justice under the law


4 posted on 07/22/2018 5:32:44 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Vox populi, vox dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

She reminds me of the kid who always wanted to match against you in a game, but doesn’t shut up for days about blaming his loss on this, that, and everything else. The difference is that after a day or so, that kid shuts up and moves on to a new challenge; this hag has been carping about losing and inventing prob. 300+ reasons for the loss, for two years. Go back to drinking yourself to the point where you can’t talk, which is never far away, Hillary.


10 posted on 07/22/2018 5:36:59 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Why is she still walking around?


12 posted on 07/22/2018 5:38:44 AM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES-GOD WITH US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Why are the Leftist idiots so suddenly concerned about Trump meeting privately with Putin. According to their lying narrative, Putin and Trump have been having private conservations for quite a while to enable Putin to defeat, single-handedly, the most intelligent woman in the world and the most qualified leader in world history.


13 posted on 07/22/2018 5:39:03 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine
Geez, it was enough to have to listen this woman moan, groan and complain about losing the 2016 election on her "What Happened" book tour for a year and a half.

Now we have to listen to her at some liberal fest in the bowls of the communist capital of the US, New York City.

Why is anyone still listening to this woman? Without even running again, she's already a two-time loser.

If she tries to run again in 2020, she'll be a three-time loser.

Even the movers and shakers in the democRAT party are telling her not to run. They know her coattails tattered pantsuit "tails" will result in down-ballot democRAT candidates losing too.

If she is the best candidate the liberals have to put forth, Trump will win again running away.

18 posted on 07/22/2018 5:46:43 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine
Putin didn't have to 'play' Hillary or Obama. They were willing stooges.

Sen. D’Amato Drops Bomb: Hillary Allowed Russia to Take Ownership of US Uranium to Sell to Iran

Jim Hoft
Jul 3rd, 2016

Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.

Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran!

Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”

It’s true.

In January 2013, Pravda celebrated the Russian atomic energy agency’s purchase of the company “Uranium One” in Canada.

That same company, Uranium One, owned uranium concessions in the United States. Because uranium is a strategically important commodity, the Russians would need approval from the Obama administration, including Hillary’s State Department, before the purchase took place.

Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. (Via Breitbart)

The New York Times reported on the crooked deal in 2015.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And then there’s this...

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) told Greta Van Susteren the deal Hillary approved gave Putin ownership of 20 percent of US uranium and Russia sells uranium to unfriendly countries, including Iran.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/senator-damato-drops-bomb-hillary-allowed-russia-take-ownership-us-uranium-sell-iran-video/

______________________________________________________________

Obama allowing Iran to purchase uranium from Russia

Daniel Horowitz | January 10, 2017

Remember those side deals Obama forged with Iran that were not part of the text of the official treaty? Now we are finding out some of the details.

Yesterday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Iranian officials confirmed they have received at least $10 billion in cash, commodities, and assets from Washington since 2013. And that is likely a conservative estimate.

But cash is not the only thing the Islamic Republic of Iran is receiving for gracing us with their willingness to sign onto our own capitulation.

The AP is reporting that Russia, with the support of President Obama, is shipping Iran 116 metric tons of natural uranium.

While Iranian officials have obviously declined to disclose the use of such uranium, AP notes that this is enough to enrich weapons-grade uranium for nuclear bombs:

“Despite present restrictions on its enrichment program, however, the amount of natural uranium is significant should Iran decide to keep it in storage, considering its potential uses once some limits on Tehran’s nuclear activities start to expire in less than a decade.

David Albright, whose Institute of Science and International Security often briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran’s nuclear program, says the shipment could be enriched to enough weapons-grade uranium for more than 10 simple nuclear bombs, “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.” ...”

See more at:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/obama-allowing-iran-to-purchase-uranium-from-russia-will-tillerson-reverse-course#sthash.guYPvONI.dpuf

_________________________________________________

Image result for etl freerepublic iran putin

19 posted on 07/22/2018 5:47:17 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

March 2012...

"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it's important for him to give me space."

Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ..."

Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."

Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." That statement tells us much about the president's mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration.

Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president's comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase "on all these issues," implying more is at stake than just missile defense."

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn't be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/

20 posted on 07/22/2018 5:47:51 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

“Clinton also weighed in...”

She wouldn’t dare!


21 posted on 07/22/2018 5:48:28 AM PDT by Walrus (Those who work should eat better than those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Image result for john podesta clinton

Uncovering the Russia ties of Hillary’s campaign chief [Podesta]

By Peter Schweizer
July 5, 2017

Lawmakers failed to seize on an alarming development in the Russia collusion story last week, one that should spark serious and immediate congressional inquiry.

But it didn’t involve President Trump or his administration.

During a heated Fox Business interview with Maria Bartiromo, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chief John Podesta made a series of misleading statements when questioned about his involvement in a company that received $35 million from the Russian government while Clinton served as secretary of state.

On Jan. 18, 2011, a small green-energy company named Joule Unlimited announced Podesta’s appointment to its board. Months later, Rusnano, a Kremlin-backed investment fund founded by Vladimir Putin, pumped $35 million into Joule. Serving alongside Podesta on Joule’s board were senior Russian official Anatoly Chubais and oligarch Ruben Vardanyan, who has been appointed by Putin to a Russian economic modernization council.

Bartiromo asked Podesta why he failed to disclose his role in Joule as required by law when he entered the White House in January 2014 to serve as counselor to President Barack Obama.

“Maria, that’s not true. I fully disclosed and was completely compliant,” Podesta shot back.

But according to his own financial disclosure form, Podesta only listed two of the three entities that made up Joule Unlimited, failing to disclose his presence on the board of the Dutch-registered Stichting Joule Global Foundation.

When Bartiromo pressed Podesta on the whereabouts of his 75,000 shares of Joule stock, Podesta resorted to Clintonesque semantics: “I didn’t have any stock in any Russian company!”

Notice the rhetorical sleight of tongue there: Joule is based in Massachusetts, not Russia, making Podesta’s statement technically true. Podesta added: “And by the way, I divested before I went into the White House.”

Yet again, it’s not that simple. WikiLeaks documents reveal that when he joined the Obama White House, Podesta transferred his Joule shares to an LLC controlled by his adult children. He also resumed communicating with Joule and Joule investors after leaving the White House and joining Clinton’s campaign. In fact, he received an invoice from his lawyers in April 2015 — a consent request for Dmitry Akhanov of Rusnano USA to join Joule’s board.

But nothing to see here, Podesta insisted.

“I was on the board of an American company that did business here and only here,” he said. “The Russian company had a small investment in that company. We can go round and around the tree.”

Was Joule’s business “here and only here” in America as Podesta claimed? Not according to Joule’s own CEO and president, Bill Sims. While thanking Putin’s Rusnano, Sims said the investment would help support “the development of our global presence” and “complements the company’s expansion plans in Europe, the Middle East, and Mexico.” Moreover, Stichting Joule is itself an overseas entity. Indeed, Rusnano’s investment in Joule was in part to develop a manufacturing facility in Russia.

And what about Podesta’s contention that Putin’s investment fund represented a “small investment” in Joule? In 2012 the company claimed it had raised $110 million to date.

That meant the Kremlin-backed $35 million investment given to Joule after Podesta’s board appointment represented over 30 percent of Joule’s outside financing.

There’s also this inconvenient fact: In 2016, Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, where Joule board member Reuben Vardanyan formerly served as head of its investment banking division, had a $170,000 lobbying contract with the Podesta Group — which is owned by John Podesta’s brother, Tony Podesta.

In short, Clinton’s top campaign chief and a senior counselor to Obama sat on Joule’s board alongside top Russian officials as Putin’s Kremlin-backed investment fund funneled $35 million into Joule. No one looking at the Podesta fact pattern can claim to care about rooting out Russian collusion and not rigorously investigate the tangle of relationships.

Are US officials investigating the matter? We don’t know. When Bartiromo asked Podesta whether his closed-door session in front of the House Intelligence Committee included questions about his Russian ties and Joule, Podesta punted: “I have already told you that I was asked not to talk about specific questions, and I said I would respect that.”

After the slippery answers Podesta delivered during his explosive Fox Business interview, US officials have more reasons than ever to demand answers about John Podesta, Joule Unlimited and Putin’s Rusnano investment fund. If they weren’t investigating Podesta before, they should be now.

http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

23 posted on 07/22/2018 5:51:00 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

John Podesta’s Payoff for Helping Hillary Give American Military Technology to Russia’s Putin

TheNewAmerican.com ^ | October, 2016 | Bob Adelmann

As part of just-inaugurated President Obama’s new foreign policy to improve relations between the United States and Russia, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in March 2009. Meeting in her hotel’s Salon Panorama in Geneva, she presented him with a small gift box containing a bright red button symbolizing the Obama administration’s desire to “reset” the relationship between the two governments.

Thus began an effort to transfer American technology to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s own “Silicon Valley,” called Skolkovo.

In a report released in late July by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) entitled From Russia With Money, authors Stephen Bannon and Peter Schweitzer reviewed the long sordid history of the technology transfer from companies such as Google, Intel, and Cisco of hi-tech technology with useful military applications.

The report quoted warnings from the FBI and the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth that the transfer would work against American interests. Warned the U.S. Army:

[The “reset” would serve as] a vehicle for world-wide technology transfers to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.

It was clearly a “quid pro quo” arrangement: 17 of the 28 companies involved in the technology transfer gave millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation or to Bill Clinton for giving some speeches.

When those authors, both of whom are affiliated with Breitbart News, summed up their conclusions, one question remained: “The GAI investigative report says it’s unclear how much, if any, money [John] Podesta made.” Podesta, having served the Clintons for years, first as chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and then as counselor to President Obama and finally as Hillary’s campaign chairman, deserved a payoff.

But it wasn’t clear until the latest batch of e-mails provided by WikiLeaks went public last week that Americans now know. For his efforts Podesta received thousands of shares of common and preferred stock in one of the companies involved in the transfer. The fact came to light when WikiLeaks published e-mails Podesta sent to the company ordering it to transfer his shares to a shell corporation he had created a month earlier.

The e-mails included a letter Podesta wrote to the corporate secretary of that company instructing him to retitle 33,693 shares of preferred stock to Leonidio Holdings, LLC, a corporation that Podesta (or one of his staff) created using a Corporation Service Company to hide the shares from public view.

The company that gave Podesta the stock shares, Joule Unlimited, claims to be a producer of “alternative” energy technology that will eventually be able to produce energy that will be competitive with oil priced at $50 a barrel. It was a recipient of millions of Putin’s rubles as one of the gang of companies working to transfer American technology to Russia, one of America’s enemies.

As Schweizer told the New York Post in an interview in July:

The Clintons, they get their donations and speaking fees in the millions of dollars. The Russians get access to advanced US technology. The tech companies get special access to the Russian market and workforce….

All I ask is that people look at the money. Who made the deals, who benefited from the deals?

Thanks to WikiLeaks the “people” now know the name of at least one of those who participated in the deals and how he benefited from them: John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager.

24 posted on 07/22/2018 5:51:39 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine
It's not diversity that is the asset of America, diversity is just a result. . .The true American asset is FREEDOM for all and the notion that all are created equal and are endowed by THE CREATOR with certain inalienable rights. The diversity of America is just one of many natural results of that core asset.

This harridan witch and all her demonic progressive cohorts, in truth, are adamantly opposed to that core asset and would, if they could, expunge the notion from our founding documents. They seek to grab the people's power and to nullify the consent of the governed. They want control of society because they believe they are better and smarter, but they are neither; they are evil.

25 posted on 07/22/2018 5:51:54 AM PDT by McBuff (To be, rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine
It's not diversity that is the asset of America, diversity is just a result. . .The true American asset is FREEDOM for all and the notion that all are created equal and are endowed by THE CREATOR with certain inalienable rights. The diversity of America is just one of many natural results of that core asset.

This harridan witch and all her demonic progressive cohorts, in truth, are adamantly opposed to that core asset and would, if they could, expunge the notion from our founding documents. They seek to grab the people's power and to nullify the consent of the governed. They want control of society because they believe they are better and smarter, but they are neither; they are evil.

26 posted on 07/22/2018 5:51:56 AM PDT by McBuff (To be, rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Image result for john podesta clinton
28 posted on 07/22/2018 5:52:22 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

And yet, Obama travel to Cuba in March, 2016 for a summit with Raul Castro, and when Castro publicly stated that the USA sucks, Obama agreed with him.


31 posted on 07/22/2018 5:54:33 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Well Bitch, your country has Putin speaking for it.


33 posted on 07/22/2018 5:56:21 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

Why aren’t both Clinton’s in Federal Penitentary.


37 posted on 07/22/2018 5:59:27 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

She must have lost her memory. See my tagline.


38 posted on 07/22/2018 6:00:25 AM PDT by McGruff (We want very much to have a strong Russia - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sevinufnine

If it had been her in the room she would have sold US assets to Putin in return for lots of money to her foundation and family. She can’t imagine that Trump would do anything else.

She’s bitter that she didn’t think of having private meetings with Putin and instead set up a private email server to do the negotiating and it was discovered.


40 posted on 07/22/2018 6:02:43 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson