Posted on 07/29/2018 1:56:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
This suggestion that the President will face impeachment if the democrats become the dominant party in the fall. Would someone please tell me just what on earth he has done, or not done, that makes him a candidate for impeachment???
What difference does it make, they’ll see it as a mandate to impeach him.
Bad spelling.
Would someone please tell me just what on earth he has done, or not done, that makes him a candidate for impeachment???
= = = = = = = = =
Don’t forget, the ‘Rs’ haven’t ‘paid’ for impeaching Bill Clinton yet.
The W Bush period was ‘wasted’ with different impeachment crap being brought up.
Remember, ‘WE’ have not paid for naming 3 carriers for Reagan/Ford/Bush yet either.
Think if Ds ever get back in COMPLETE CONTROl ships being named for both OBs, both Clintons, and a group of the vilest Ds they can muster up...
It will not be about ‘honoring’ people, it will be about desecrating the Rs
I’d rather they try to impeach Trump so that we can get CW 2.0 out of the way.
You mean like we weeded out the RINO in Alabama in the primary, and made Roy Moore as the preferred republican candidate in general? I dunno if that is smart! And There are dozens of similar examples where we traded a safe republican seat to a democrat.
I’d take my chances with the RINOs in Republican controlled Congress any day over a Dem Majority. Just the thought .... ugh!!!
That's an irrelevant example. Moore had issues, and Trump endorsed his "RINO" prinary opponent. As a general rule we should weed out RINOs in the primaries. In Virginia we did just that. Corey Stewart will have a tough fight being smeared all the time by the local rag (Washpost). They will try to "Moore" him but that will fail, Corey is clean.
When you’re headed for the waterfall, you reach for the nearest rock and hold out until you get rescued. Voting for RINOs is “reaching for the rock”.
All the RINOs passed his tax cut. You could make a good argument that they caused some problems with special interest demands. But nearly all the Republicans did that, especially in the Senate.
Good point.
I agree. And I wonder just what is the real agenda of SOME of them.
Me too.
Great comment.
Every RINO on the ballot is OUR fault, for not defeating them in the Primary with a Limited Government candidate. We’ve only gunned down 6 so far (several Primaries left in AUG), instead of the 60 it should have been. (But a few more have conveniently “retired”, like Ryan, Flake, etc.)
Since there are 435 House seats contested every 2 years, there is no way anyone can keep track of all that is going on there.
But the general point remains..which is nominate a candidate who polls best in general. The classic case in point is Delaware, where republicans chose O’Donnell who was endorsed by Palin & Demint, over the other candidate (whose name escapes me at the moment) who was polling better and was more likely to win, but was considered a RINO. Instead we got senator Coons.
“What makes Bannon think that the RINOs would vote to save President Trump?”
Democrats are guaranteed votes against President Trump. RINOs are more amenable to pressure and persuasion.
Not always true. All of the following were limited government, pro-life, pro-2nd Amend candidates.
Actually solid conservative all.
They all lost in general.
Todd Akin
Ken Cuccinelli
Richard Mourdock
Sharon Angle
Christine O’Donnell
George Allen
Joe Miller
Ken Buck
Alan West
Doug Hoffman
Better to follow Ronald Reagan’s rule, to vote for the republican candidate most likely to win in general. Not so pure republicans are usually better than democrats.
Intelligent Thinking BeauBo...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.