“Former Judge Robert Bork said Friday that Microsoft should be broken into three identical companies at the end of its antitrust trial.
‘My own opinion is that I think structural relief is probably going to be required,’ Bork told reporters at a luncheon meeting of ProComp, a group that approves of the government antitrust charges against Microsoft (MSFT).
“Bork represents Netscape Communications (NSCP), but he emphasized: ‘I’m not speaking for Netscape and I’m not speaking for ProComp.... I have not cleared my remarks’
https://www.wired.com/1999/01/judge-bork-break-up-microsoft/
That's said, every now and then I'm reminded of things Bork wrote like what you posted and his 2nd Amendment views and reconsider whether or not we dodged a bullet. Indeed, consider the impact of Bork vs Kennedy rulings until Bork's death in 2012 - Casey is a stand-out where Bork likely would have swayed the outcome but we may have lost Heller - and a replacement by Obama...arguably Kennedy MAY have been a better pick in the long run.