Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity

This is a fairly common tactic. They want the jury to hold the prosecution to their burden of “beyond a reasonable doubt” rather than just comparing the defense vs. prosecution case and voting on who had the better case.


I’m ashamed to say this, but I’m 64 and I didn’t get this concept until last year watching an episode of Suits. When the prosecution has not made their case beyond a reasonable doubt, your job is not to make your own case that you are innocent. Your job is to demonstrate that they have not made their case.


55 posted on 08/14/2018 9:58:11 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

I am guessing that there are essential elements of proof on each of the charges that are absent from the prosecution’s case and so it is dismissal by the judge or a direct appeal.


68 posted on 08/14/2018 10:18:28 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson