Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC Was Fuming Mad After Their Employee Lost His Security Clearance
https://www.newsbusters.org ^ | August 15, 2018 | Nicholas Fondacaro

Posted on 08/16/2018 4:19:07 AM PDT by Enterprise

As would be expected, the loss of Brennan’s security clearance was the first thing anchor Lester Holt got to during NBC Nightly News. “It looks a lot like payback tonight for some former senior government officials who have spoken out against President Trump,” he bitterly declared. “The President yanking the security clearance for former CIA boss John Brennan today accusing him of using his access to ‘sow division and chaos’ at the White House.”

“Unprecedented,” White House correspondent Kristen Welker proclaimed at the start of her report. “President Trump tonight revoking the security clearance of one of his harshest critics, career intelligence official and former CIA Director John Brennan, who’s also an NBC News analyst.” Of course, she omitted how under his leadership the CIA spied on U.S. Senators and hacked their computers, then lied about it under oath.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brennan; critic; hater; leak; scum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: longtermmemmory

Absolutely, Brennan just lost his part time job.


41 posted on 08/16/2018 6:56:40 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

CALL THE WHAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMBULANCE.


42 posted on 08/16/2018 6:58:27 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

God bless President Trump!


43 posted on 08/16/2018 6:58:36 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I had a security clearance well above TS for over 30 years. The day I retired my clearance was terminated. What part of NEED TO KNOW is unclear? Whenever they have needed to talk with me about any of my previous work there are ways to do it. What a bunch of whining morons!


44 posted on 08/16/2018 7:09:45 AM PDT by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Yes, and every job I’ve ever left allowed me to keep my user name and password, so I could access the company’s network and files, download whatever I wanted, go in and snoop around, etc. Yeah, that happens. It’s incredibly telling that the media isn’t asking why he still had the clearance, if he no longer worked in the government. What was his “need to know”?


45 posted on 08/16/2018 7:09:57 AM PDT by Hoffer Rand (God be greater than the worries in my life, be stronger than the weakness in my mind, be magnified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

For the record, and lest we forget.....

NBC = Comcast

Comcast is an American enemy more dangerous than russia of Iran or North Korea


46 posted on 08/16/2018 7:11:24 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12) Sanctuary is Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Comrade Brennan should never have had a clearance in the first place.


47 posted on 08/16/2018 7:19:56 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Trump: "I am Batman!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
A lot of people criticize our POTUS who do not have security clearance.

What does that have to do with security clearance?

Other than preventing contact with enemies domestic who held security clearances, violated the national trust and quit or were fired.

One would have to be a functional moron to expect to keep their security clearance, as well as anyone supporting the absurdity.

48 posted on 08/16/2018 10:20:11 AM PDT by publius911 (Rule by Fiat-Obama's a Phone and a Pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: publius911

Exactly. Security clearance and a person’s right to criticize are unrelated.


49 posted on 08/16/2018 10:43:02 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

.
Well, it is unprecedented!

The precedent is Jail time for his crimes.


50 posted on 08/16/2018 10:47:51 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

LOLOL, bitter NBC knows Traitor Brennan is totally screwed and there’s nothing they can do about it.


51 posted on 08/16/2018 10:51:00 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
So when the Army took away my security clearances when I retired, they were doing it to “shut me up”? I never thought about it that way.

well you should have. Many ex-military and National Security veterans have.

I happened to read a half dozen books recently about WW2 against the Japanese and the decade or two preceding it.

That involved the history of Flying Boats, the role of PanAmerican Airways in preparing for the attack by the Japanese which was just a matter of time, and the unrevealed events against Japanese spies and sneak attacks (pre-Pearl Harbor) which failed.

Old fashioned Patriotism prevented military service persons from that era from revealing National Security events that they participated in or witnessed many decades after that war and until they day they died. This includes much that happened 90 years ago, which even today is not accessible by Americans from the National Archives.

Today, the insanity of political correctness and naked stupidity makes that no longer possible; hence this thread, as an example, and the whining by Enemies Domestic losing their security clearances.

52 posted on 08/16/2018 10:56:04 AM PDT by publius911 (Rule by Fiat-Obama's a Phone and a Pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
This must be from decades ago; the CNN badge shows the traitor with a full head of hair.
How long has this crook been an Enemy Domestic, anyway?
53 posted on 08/16/2018 11:00:19 AM PDT by publius911 (Rule by Fiat-Obama's a Phone and a Pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

I hope this ends up generating a government wide policy that upon severance from Fed. service ALL security clearances are revoked. A new security clearance must be applied for and re-certified every two years. There must also be a national security need for the new clearance to be issued.

Wanting to be a talking head in the media is not a national security need.


54 posted on 08/16/2018 11:05:43 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Consensus isn't science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Agree. When I retired from the reserves, my need to know ended, and my security clearances ended with it. It wasn’t the desire of the Government to silence me, it was the reality that I had no more need to have access to information that I needed to perform my assignment. And as for me, I don’t miss having a clearance.


55 posted on 08/16/2018 11:51:22 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Because of the volume of people who may have need for a clearance, it might be difficult to try to re-certify everyone on a two year basis. Upon leaving government or military service it should be automatic that the clearance should be pulled. That being said, at some point President Trump will be out of office. It would be prudent to continue his clearance as a means to assist a new President in matters President Trump has detailed knowledge about.


56 posted on 08/16/2018 11:54:52 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Based on his background, he should not have been granted a clearance. It’s disgusting.


57 posted on 08/16/2018 11:56:58 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

The WH explanation could have been as simple as, “We think having an employee of a press outlet with a TS security clearance an unnecessary risk and we yanked it.”


58 posted on 08/16/2018 11:57:46 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

What classified info would NBC have a RIGHT TO KNOW?
Brennan’s clearance was classified as inactive the
day he left his government employed position.
Revoking it slams the door shut on his gaining
another government job where a clearance is required.
NBC is howling more fake outrage.


59 posted on 08/16/2018 2:54:52 PM PDT by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lean-Right

NBC had no need to know ANYTHING that was classified. They are going to have to find out the old fashioned way with snitches and traitors.


60 posted on 08/16/2018 2:58:52 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson