Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rebelbase

I would think a private company could remove the core for 25% of the government cost. Then tow it out to see and use to for torpedo practice.


35 posted on 08/16/2018 11:16:30 AM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LukeL
I would think a private company could remove the core for 25% of the government cost.

I qualified on A1W for my nuclear submarine duty which was the prototype reactor that was located in the Idaho desert for the Tunaprise (the nickname at prototype for the ship).

At the prototype they had two reactors with one control room. On the ship, they had EIGHT reactors.

Why so many? It was because the reactors were closer to submarine reactors (lower power) than they were to later generations of aircraft carrier reactors.

They typically remove the core (nuclear fuel) decades earlier and then let some of the shorter life isotopes decay in the piping and the rx vessel before they start disassembly.

I watched an old test reactor similar to these decommissioned in South Carolina. Even after decades, it was quite a job.

73 posted on 08/16/2018 1:29:05 PM PDT by politicianslie (OPTIMIST-Glass 1/2 full- PESSIMIST 1/2 empty TO ENGINEER, Glass is twice as big as it needs to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson