Replies

This was discussed last night. Subpoenas were issued earlier this year as part of the Cohen investigation into the NDA and burying the stories about the two women. The press is playing with words. Saying someone “has been” subpoenaed creates a breaking news story. Writing the truth and saying someone WAS subpoenaed as part of the Cohen investigation means it is old news. Trump and his attorneys already knew about this. I am sure they were aware of what these people were going to say. When the Feds and State Attorneys come knocking a smart defense lawyer is going to demand immunity before anything is said. Also pointed out last night this is all related to Cohen NOT Trump and of the two non-crimes he plead guilty to. One faux crime if a crime only applies to a donor not the recipient, the other non crime requires someone to twist and strain the interpretation to even connect Trump to a faux illegal contribution. If either contributions were in fact illegal, they only indict the contributor not the recipient. I fully believe Giuliani’s job has been to be the Presidents mouth piece, leaking information and getting out in front of what some of these individuals said in regards to Cohen and the payouts. People acted like Giuliani was a fool for things he said but I think he was playing Briar Rabbit. I also felt all along that a few of the so called leaks by unnamed sources came from the Trump legal team allowing Giuliani to refute allegations and suppositions. The idea that the Attorney General for New York State is looking into the Trump organization for illegal campaign activities is also a red herring. What campaign law did they violate if Trump was funding his own campaign? Also opens a can of worms, so the Texas States Attorney can open an investigation into the Hillary campaign donations. In the end you have multiple state investigating to see if a campaign for federal office violated any state laws, what an mess that would be,