“D”. Yes, it is that simple.
Uhhhh….Booker’s is true and the accusations against Kavanaugh have been as disproven as possible. “as possible” because you can’t prove something didn’t occur if you don’t know when, or where, or who was involved.
The main difference is that Booker’s a Democrat.
When it comes to Democrats..the left ALWAYS makes excuses for them..ALWAYS
(I'm from New Jersey and I have doubts that Booker has touched very many female breasts, at least in the last 48 years (he's 49), but he claims that he did, unlike Kavanaugh.)
Predictably bone-headed (Can I still say that?!) editorial.
He claims that the "groping incident" took place on New Year's Eve 1984 while the music from "Top Gun" was playing in his mind ... but "Top Gun" wasn't released until May of 1986.
His Stanford newspaper column was nothing more than a pathetic attempt to establish heterosexual creds for himself.
-PJ
Booker showed interest in a female? I don’t think either incident happened.
Let’s set aside that most of ya think the accusations against Kavanaugh are false, whether misidentified or pure lies.
Now - the booker thing... are we now at a place where a young man, kissing a girl, is not allowed to try to get to second base? Seriously? Yeah, it’s groping. That doesn’t make it inappropriate.
Am I supposed to teach my son to get a cell phone video of consent before each step in the process? Good gosh
But, but....but.....that’s different, donchaknow?
He’s a black “D” so it’s ok.
One groping incident happened and the other didn’t.
Simple as that.
If you vote leftist and fight for leftist causes, groping and even violent rape is ok. They STILL fete Bill Clinton, for gosh sakes!!!
Poor Juanita. I don’t know how she can stand to see any of this crap. She only wishes it had been a teenaged boy on her for a few minutes and not the attorney general or whatever he was actually ripping her clothes, biting her painfully, and raping her twice. NO ONE CARED AT ALL. NO ONE BELIEVED JUANITA except us.
This is a textbook example illustrating the difference between rationalization and explanation. They decide, before the fact, that Booker gets a pass, and then try to come up with a reason that they deem plausible. “That’s the ticket!”
I heard this story and said to myself, What the heck does this have to do with Kavanaugh? They are completely different situations. For starters, one actually happened.
The difference is he has a “D” by his name... if he had raped her the damn studges in the press would not have covered it... Ask Paula or Juanita...
The ‘press’ doesn’t give a damn unless damaging a conservative is part of the package. Eff the New York Times and Washington Post.
You are correct, they are NOT the same. Booker (B) wrote about it bc he did it. Kavanaugh didn’t bc he says it didn’t happen. If it didn’t happen, how would he know to deny it?
B and K work in two different worlds. B’s constituents are liberal and evidently don’t care about his gropes bc he’s one of their’s. And you know that.
Has a woman stepped forward and confirmed that Booker touched her breasts? Until that happens, I remain skeptical.
Spartapimp.