While that is my concern, I’m still trying to figure out how will they be able to prove she’s lying. I mean, I’m sure she’s lying. It’s still pretty much proving a negative, but in reverse. It’s going to be interesting.
I would guess that the prosecutor will try to draw as many details out the she can, but Ford is already on the record as not remembering. So, after dozens of questions where she answers "I don't recall", it's going to be odd for her to claim she's so certain it was Kavanaugh. She will have to provide some really good answers why she knows it was him, who introduced him to her, when did she first meet him, what was her first impression of him, why did she go to a house party with him, and so on. And what else did she know about him? What was he wearing? And then the prosecutor will have the same questions about each of the others she claims was there.
She will probably also ask a lot of questions about Leland Kelsey. Such as, after reviewing her statement that she never met Brett Kavanaugh and never went to a gathering as described, does she think Kelsey is lying?
You can be sure, the questions are going to be a grind on someone who has a weak story, and is unaccustomed to this kind of setting.
This kind of thing, even the legal language and process is Kavanaugh's profession, and he is among the best at it. He will hit a home run.