Posted on 09/29/2018 12:54:47 PM PDT by Drew68
1. I don't know Christine Blasey-Ford, but I do know what Democrat political operations look like when I see them.
2. I also know what Democrat "handlers" do when they are working their political instructions. In this case the visible handlers are: Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich.
3. The reason Ms. Ford's airline travel was an issue, was because Katz and Bromwich constructed that *false narrative* as a delay tactic.
4. Likely the socially awkward Ms. Ford was a useful tool by Katz Inc. on behalf of the Democrats and their media allies. This is how they roll.
5. Hence Ms. Ford has no idea who is the financier behind the entire operation; and all of her subsequent expenses. The script was written around her, with an intended purpose. Likely the first narrative was reliant on never actually appearing before congress.
6. The airport hotel lie-detector narrative, part of the constructed evidence through Katz inc. A familiar testing resource, only two questions, a carefully written script to follow etc. Purchased via legal counsel (Katz Inc.)
7. As the loose narrative became more evident it was going to end with a congressional appearance, Katz needed more specific support from a Capitol Hill legal insider. Enter Bromwich's contracted assistance.
8. Loose origination details lead to conflicts. During narrative engineering the most important part of creating falsehood is to avoid specificity.
9. Specific claims can be hazards because if they are refuted, the gig is up. So everything needs to be vague, ambiguous and easier to shape.
10. The narrative engineers cannot specify the *house* where the event took place, because that would lead to specific ownership trouble. If the owner of the residence refutes the false claim, the lie cannot advance. Hence, the "where" must be generally ambiguous.
11. The "when" can also be a problem. It would suck to give a specific "WHEN" only to find out the accused wasn't in town, or was elsewhere. Hence any specific "when" must be avoided to retain the false assertion.
12. As noted, the "who" in this narrative *had to* be a part of the story. But as with this story under scrutiny those four "who's" actually refuted the accusation and aligned with the accused. Thus the problem with specific "who's".
13. The use of a validating "counselor" or "therapist" is a common part of a false narrative. The reason is HIPPA protection. Regardless of what the accuser claims, the Dr. is bound to silence unless released.
14. Now we see more of the origination details falling apart
15. Keep pulling these threads, and there's likely to be many more aspects of the false narrative that will fall apart. [fear of flying, document origination and process issues]
16. One can easily imagine a person being exploited, who was promised their need to testify would likely be negligible, beginning to freak out as it appeared testimony was going to be required. Imagine the stress.
17. Which would explain the emails to the committee backing out.... trying to find an exit.... not realizing it was going to go THIS FAR. I would doubt strongly the "hacked work email" is even remotely accurate. Occam's Razor = Panic.
18. Under questioning, the Ms. Ford doesn't even know the committee volunteered to go to her, because the *handlers* (Katz Inc, then Bromwich) controlled everything. She was originally clueless to the airline travel excuse which needed to be constructed rapidly.
19. The handlers can't change history, the frequency of Ms. Ford's airline travel negated the original excuse; and needed to be shaped. Thus she needed to support the excuse in testimony, yet historic reality refutes it.
20. This is how modern Democrats roll. Fabrication and the false framework of accusation is their skillset. The lie only needs to hold up long enough to get them to the objective. [ex. Romney's taxes and Harry Reid]
21. The end justifies the means; any means. Nothing is out of bounds. This is how the modern political left operate now. Leaks, lies and intentional falsehoods. This is what Lindsey Graham was angry about during the Kavanaugh hearing.
They don't care.
/END
There’s also another possibility. If she’s as ditzy as some here believe she might inadvertently spill the beans about being coached and groomed for this operation. How crazy is it to consider she might be “offed” before she testifies That could give the dems an opportunity to claim she committed suicide and then that she was “driven” to do so by those bad republicans.
Nah... The Left isn’t THAT evil. Is it?
Anyway, I hope she has a bunch of good “insurance” squirrelled away in a safe place.
What's worse is that the media has picked sides. My favorite example is the one-week delay. Before it was announced, almost every media person said there was no reason to object to an FBI investigation. After it was announces, the same media people started talking about how the delay would kill the nomination's momentum.
Will do!
Wikipedia shows Christine Blasey Ford as having one relative, a niece named Bridget Mendel? No mention of siblings, no mention of parents.
You’re probably correct.
And she looks like a haggard, recovering-alcoholic Tweety Bird in those glasses.
It’s ridiculous.
The Blasey family; Ford's parents and two older brothers did not wish to be involved and have been avoiding the press.
Christine Blasey Ford’s family has been nearly silent amid outpouring of support
They couldn’t go after her like they should have b/c it would have been perceived as victim bullying and the left would have run with it. Even now, I keep hearing that she was “credible”. She wasn’t. She was lying and everybody knows it.
[This is a political op, and criminal conspiracy to defame, top to bottom.]
“How could any rational, sane person believe otherwise?”
It’s totally obvious. The Twilight Zone part is how deep it goes, how thought-out and professionally it was done. And how it foreshadows future Dem operations.
The 2008 PERMIT for the House remodel was SWORN to as being in 2012!! PEREJURY!!! One Lie, all LIES!
Where is MR. FORD??
There was a time when I would have thought:
But not any more.
Yes, all of her actions in life are because of the trauma in high school..
I agree. If they don’t then are as useless as that ‘prosecutor’ that the Republicans hired. If it really is an investigation, then they have no choice but to investigate all of the parties involved.
I hate to say it, but he's probably a brow-beaten male who knows he has to ‘go along to get along’ and wants to hold his family together.
Not that it would do any good, but if I were the Republicans, I would put out to the press that they are demanding that she be interviewed under the penalty of lying to the FBI....the Democrats sure made sure of that for Kavanaugh.
Oh, yeah, I’d also be interested in seeing all of her social media before she scrubbed it/turned it off. I expect the sites keep those records so it shouldn’t be a problem to turn it over to LE.
It is excellent.
Woulda coulda shoulda. Judge Kavenaugh intended to watch Dr. Ford’s testimony, but didn’t. You can understand the emotional stress that would have entailed . . .But had anyone with any chance to brief him anticipated that any Democrat would use that Latin expression, the devastating answer to that query would have been for Kavenaugh to say, “I think it means,
‘If the people behind this enormous smear lied about fear of flying, you have to wonder what else the committee has been lied to about by that bunch.’"
Awesome, awesome post thank you.
People need to do twitter. It’s easy to sign up and you don’t have to post. I’ve gotten a lot of information and enjoyment out of it. Reading David Horowitz’s blasts are amazing.
James Woods is still missing, though.
James Woods has probably gone to gab.ai / gab.com...
Many conservatives or libertarians who have been banned or suspended from Twitter like James Woods, have migrated to gab, a free speech alternative.
Here are his tweets:
https://gab.ai/RealJamesWoodsTweets
Here are David Horowitz Tweets on gab (one posted 14 minutes ago):
https://gab.ai/search/david%20horowitz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network)
I am ambivalent about using Twitter as I don’t like supporting their leftist leanings (Same for Facebook, etc .). However, they are a primary source of information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.