Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gswilder
Well, you see they say it is suddenly a “campaign finance violation” because they say it “influenced” the 2016 election somehow, and because they say it is such a thing and it didn’t get listed as a campaign expense on campaign finance filings, presto change-o—“felony”, according to them. Even more tortuous than the “penumbras and emanations” in the Roe v. Wade decision.
75 posted on 12/09/2018 2:24:33 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

Question.....HOW did it influence the election?

Answer..... It did.

Question.....How?

Answer..... It did.

Question.....How?

Answer..... It did. Other all the Deplorables being as stupid and easily led as they are, would have voted for her. So, even though the ads that came out about her were after the election and no one even knows what they are, the did influence the election.

Question.... How?

Answer...... It did.


119 posted on 12/10/2018 4:26:13 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson