Great points about the interview notes. Mueller knew the date discrepancy with the 302, and he knew that Flynn was advised by McCabe that he didn’t need legal counsel with him when he was interrogated. It’s all in his sentencing report. I believe Mueller has known this all along. Even Comey said recently that the Flynn interview was not normal agency protocol. If Comey knew it...Mueller knew it. Knowing that, why did Mueller move ahead with charging Flynn? Well of course I know why, but if that’s the case, and Mueller didn’t provide that info to the court when Flynn was first charged, who’s obstructing justice now? Mueller withheld that evidence from the court. Any sane Judge wouldn’t have allowed a charge against someone to move ahead if the interrogation that brought the charge had been compromised.
comey is far and away the lynchpin (pun intended0 of protecting the clintons and Obama and pushing the coup against Trump. Another dem criminal walking around free..
Why would Flynn believe for a microsecond that he would not need a lawyer present while palling around for a couple hours with a couple FBI gumshoes? I don’t care what they said. I’d tell them to GFT until my lawyer got there. Of Course hindsight is 20/20
The quandary and vulnerability of the accused is sobering. First, you have the FBI which, under the last gaggle of administrators at every level took upon themselves what they perceived as their patriotic duty to sabotage Trump at every opportunity. The FBI is never shy about touting its reputation as the best and brightest and most upright law enforcement organization there is. Don’t think this doesn’t bamboozle plenty of judges. They get the benefit of the doubt 90% of the time, without question.
Now you have Mueller, who can and will suborn perjury from one in order to build a case against another, and who need not follow normal Brady rules which would ordinarily compel him to produce and share exculpatory evidence with the defense. That’s what we have here.