Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat

Carriers be they USA, Japan, or Chinese are formidable instruments to project force at distance in conventional warfare. In total conflict between nuclear forces theirs as ours are dead meat. If they can be seen from space they will die from space or rockets launched from surface ships or land. If you can see them you can kill them be it theirs our ours if you go nuclear.

The real ships of total destruction are our “boomers” Each one of the subs has the capability of destroying any nation as a functioning society. We have many. Oddly the purpose of our boomers is the supposition that we receive a first strike that takes out our missiles and aircraft for a counter strike. They might get our aircraft, they will not get all our hardened missiles in silos. Even if they did achieve this unlikely act, our boomers would destroy them.

Boomers are the ultimate weapon of destruction. From the depths of the arctic, the Atlantic and Pacific lurk total destruction for any nation that attacks us. Even if these boomers are attacked by hunter killer subs they would need to take every damn one of them out in a coordinated attack on our missiles and land based aircraft to avoid total destruction. Our enemies do not have this capability. If our boomers started dying we would launch our land based missiles and aircraft.


16 posted on 12/18/2018 12:26:38 AM PST by cpdiii (Cane Cutter, Deckhand,Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: cpdiii

In a war of threats that the Chinese prefer (See the Philippines) these will be a deterrent. Especially if they build more than 2. Japan’s big problem is birthrate. You can’t really have 70 year-old pilots


17 posted on 12/18/2018 12:56:57 AM PST by Fai Mao (There is no rule of law in the US until The PIAPS is executed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
Another land lubber talking about "killing" a carrier. That term "kill" doesn't apply to naval warfare. One missile will not "kill" a carrier. To "kill" a carrier you have sink it. To sink a carrier requires under water hull damage. This requires a torpedo(s) or mines, not a missile(s). It takes two torpedo hits to sink an FFG weighing 5,000 tons. A carrier is 20 times that size so it would take 40 torpedoes to SINK a carrier.

The biggest threat to carriers are the lack of naval repair facilities and dry docks, not missiles. If a carrier limps back to port and there is no place to repair it then that is a soft kill. Thanks to Free Traitors™ our industrial base is not capable of sustaining a protracted naval war. Thanks Free Traitors™.

31 posted on 12/18/2018 1:46:14 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson