[thoughtomator]

If there’s a nuclear war, it’s important that no one in DC survives it, or even thinks they have a chance of surviving it.

Because the moment those f-ers think they can get rid of us while staying alive themselves, those missiles are going to get launched.

[DIRTYSECRET]

Nuclear war. While we’re at it take out 13 arab capitols as well as Mecca and Medina.

[familyop]

"Because the moment those f-ers think they can get rid of us while staying alive themselves, those missiles are going to get launched."

That's the beautiful part. Dictators in tyrannical nations make sure that they, their families, their friends and party favorites are well sheltered and stocked-up on everything. So yes, they'll launch, when they think they'll do enough damage to our population.
Besides, the word is out, that most people will survive a nuclear exchange (not much fallout from air bursts except in blast areas for a few miles of radius).

The real war starts after the nuclear exchanges, you see. Invasions are mounted post haste, and numbers involved in enormous conscription efforts will be shocking to civilians (tens of millions, quickly). The nation with the most men remaining alive for drafting will have a much better chance. So yes, population reducing weapons (city killers) will be used.

Presentations like "The Day After" and similarly named propaganda efforts have misled many. The folks of the elite left don't plan to give up like those who are affected by their propaganda.

[elcid1970]

What about that West Virginia resort that is also an underground survival city for Washington elites & their staffs & families?

Anyway, we were ready to go to war over Russian nukes or bombers staged on Cuba, as well as the Punte Huete airfield in communist Nicaragua, so what’s different now if the Monroe Doctrine is still in effect?