Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deplorableindc

Isn’t filth protected by our First Amendment?


24 posted on 01/15/2019 8:44:46 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 353FMG
Isn’t filth protected by our First Amendment?

Yes, although not completely. The Supreme Court adopted a test in the 1970's that makes it extremely difficult, but not impossible, to prosecute for obscenity. There have been a handful of successful prosecutions since, almost all of people who crossed the invisible lines observed by the industry.

Reagan appointed the Meese Commission to try to figure out how to regulate if not prohibit the stuff, but ultimately concluded it wasn't possible under SCOTUS' First Amendment case law.

32 posted on 01/15/2019 10:46:42 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: 353FMG
Isn’t filth protected by our First Amendment?

Pretty much, or at least that's how the SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled.

For me, this isn't a Constitutional issue as much as it is about law enforcement priorities. You'd think that law enforcement would have more important things to worry about than some loser pleasuring himself as he watches two strangers have sex on a TV or computer screen, but evidently that isn't so. It's the same reason that I think busting people for smoking weed is a big waste of law enforcement resources.

33 posted on 01/15/2019 10:55:52 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson