Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leftism - Not Just Wrong, But Evil
Frontpagemagazine ^ | February 8, 2019 | Mark Tapson

Posted on 02/08/2019 4:17:38 AM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: mjp
Statism and socialism do not cause death in and of themselves. One can be alive, but miserable, especially under socialism. There is a reason why the Declaration of Independence specifies that a free people must construct a government that is conducive to both safety and happiness—the “standard of value” cannot be either low or false.
41 posted on 02/08/2019 10:56:07 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stanne
At all times there is a man involved. Most often he willfully discards the child and most often the woman as well.

She still chose him to be the one to impregnate her. She therefore chose poorly.

Perhaps we should go back to having parents choose what man gets access to their daughter, rather than leaving it to young women who have not yet gained maturity?

42 posted on 02/08/2019 11:09:58 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner, Johnny.

What happened shortly after women received the franchise? FDR and his socialism. Ever since, politicians have to pander to women, who want to be taken care of. Well, women and girly, soy boy men want to be taken care of. Government becomes their husband.


43 posted on 02/08/2019 12:10:16 PM PST by afsnco (18 of 20 in AF JAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Why not?

I’m not saying it’s all mens’ fault but they are at fault

...And going back to or forward to getting married first. And women choosing capable providers


44 posted on 02/08/2019 12:27:09 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Unfortunately you will never be able to screen our the rare gems so yes, they need to be barred along with all the rest. It would be great if we could screen out all the dingbats both male and female so then the rare women who may actually be better than any man could serve but as you no doubt have witnessed, no one hates Sarah Palin more than other women hate her, they would rather vote for someone like AOC or Nancy Pelosi. No woman should vote nor run for office.


45 posted on 02/08/2019 12:45:19 PM PST by RipSawyer (AOC is Michael Moore's ideal president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Well, the greatest tyrants of the last century were not women. And one of the judges of Israel was a woman (Deborah), and she is counted as one of the better ones.

I can understand the preservation and perpetuation of the family, but that will take women realizing its importance rather than attempting to put them back into their natural God-given role by force (meaning human force).


46 posted on 02/08/2019 2:36:59 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Well, the greatest tyrants of the last century were not women. And one of the judges of Israel was a woman (Deborah), and she is counted as one of the better ones.”

I accept what you say but at the same time I don’t think there were that many women who had the power to be great tyrants in the last century. Put them at the helm of many nations and things may turn out differently. As far as one judge in Israel that means little or nothing. Would you want to live in a country where AOC has any kind of control over events? The idea scares me witless. Never forget, the road to hell really IS paved with good intentions.


47 posted on 02/08/2019 3:16:07 PM PST by RipSawyer (AOC is Michael Moore's ideal president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

It could be either AOC or Bernie Sanders. The key there is the ideology, and that is not tied to sex no matter how much the liberal media tries to push the notion.

My mother is conservative and votes for conservative Republicans.


48 posted on 02/08/2019 3:18:18 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

PS. Obama was not a “transman” either, nor have I come across anyone who suspected him of same; plenty of childhood photos show him to be male. Look at the damage he did.


49 posted on 02/08/2019 3:19:54 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I think Sanders is probably faking it and doesn’t really believe the nonsense he spouts, AOC is probably ignorant enough to believe her own garbage which may make her far more dangerous. My mother was very conservative also but she was born in 1916 and literally walked three miles to school and three miles back, there aren’t many like her left.


50 posted on 02/08/2019 3:23:58 PM PST by RipSawyer (AOC is Michael Moore's ideal president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There are no words sufficient to express my contempt for Obama but that has no bearing on my belief that giving women the vote was a big mistake. Without women voting there is a good chance Obama would never have been elected. The same goes for Bill Clinton.


51 posted on 02/08/2019 3:58:15 PM PST by RipSawyer (AOC is Michael Moore's ideal president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

None of them believe it.

It’s like O’Brien in 1984, where he points out that all the Party is seeking is “power entirely for its own sake”—the Dems and RINOs are after that.


52 posted on 02/08/2019 4:15:32 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I would never try to come up with an alternative to our Constitution. I'm sorry if I gave that impression.

I was talking about things like ‘health care’ since that's what democrats are going to run on. Traditional Americans must come up with systems based on capitalism - the invisible hand - citizens making choices NOT big government bureaucracies gaining power. If we don't we'll lose to democrats and possibly lose to socialists...

We need to create things that help citizens while taking power AWAY from deep state bureaucrats... Sane 'health care' is on that list.

53 posted on 02/09/2019 7:39:43 AM PST by GOPJ (We renew our resolve America will NEVER be a socialist country. We are born free we will STAY free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
On every issue, Democrats are on the side of chaos and destruction, crime and disorder.
<><> They hype the threat of white supremacism while whitewashing Islamic terrorism.
<><> They are actively engaged in erasing our history and undermining our rights.
<><> They support open borders over national security;
<><> They support sanctuary cities for criminal aliens and
<><> They support the abolishment of ICE;
<><> They ignore the dangers to law-abiding citizens from illegal immigration;
<><> They rabidly support infanticide over the sacredness of human life;
<><> They want more power to dismantle Western civilization rather than its preservation.

What we are witnessing is the Democrat Party as an invading Army waging war against a peaceful people.
Illegal aliens flooding the border are their foot soldiers.....marching to the ballot box.

54 posted on 02/10/2019 5:51:52 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The mask hiding the war-mongering Left’s genocidal rage slipped during the print/electronic lynching of Covington Catholic’s high school boys.

And it was frightening. Lefty lynch mobs called for assorted horrors even the most savage war machine could not envision:
<><> feeding teenage boys head-first into wood chippers,
<><> locking the boys into the school and burning the school to the ground.

The obedient media (print, broadcast, social) unwittingly exposed the wrath of the Left’s Orwellian hate days after the factual record was corrected.

==================================================

Let's see. Who else might be inconvenient to the left, who might the left war-mongers consider expendable?

Obama Declares War On ‘Extremism’ – Are You An ‘Extremist’
FR Posted 1/13/15 by seekandfind

A list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” or “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. This list will really give you a good idea of what Barack Obama means when he uses the word “extremist”. Each of these 72 items is linked (at web site). As you can see, this list potentially includes most of the country…

THE LIST OF "EXTREMISTS" WERE LISTED IN OBAMA-ERA OFFICIAL
GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING THE DEPT OF DEFENSE

Those that talk about “individual liberties,” that advocate for states’ rights, that want “to make the world a better place,” that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations.” Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable.” Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions.” Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

“Anti-Gay,” “Anti-Immigrant,” “Anti-Muslim,”“The Patriot Movement,” “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

Members of the Family Research Council, the American Family Association, Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, the Tennessee Freedom Coalition, the Christian Action Network, citizens networks.

Those “opposed to the New World Order,” engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”, those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

Anyone opposed to Agenda 21, anyone concerned about FEMA camps, that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations,” the militia movement, sovereign citizen movement, that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

Anyone that “complains about bias,” that “believes in government conspiracies, that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies,” that “visits extremist websites/blogs,” that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views," that “attends rallies for extremist causes,” that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance," that is personally connected with a grievance,” that “suddenly acquires weapons,” that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack,” that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism,” that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)” that would “insert religion into the political sphere,” that would “seek to politicize religion,” that have “supported political movements for autonomy.”

Anyone that is “anti-abortion.”

Anyone that is “Right-wing" including “Returning veterans.” Dept of Defense documents indicate Obama wanted homes of returning veteran earched. Those concerned about “illegal immigration,” those that “believe in the right to bear arms.” Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling” Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes,” those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

Those that have a negative view of the United Nations, that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes,” that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr, that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

Those that believe in “end times” prophecies, including Evangelical Christians

55 posted on 02/10/2019 5:57:38 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

bump


56 posted on 02/11/2019 2:59:41 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

“There are no words sufficient to express my contempt for Obama but that has no bearing on my belief that giving women the vote was a big mistake. Without women voting there is a good chance Obama would never have been elected. The same goes for Bill Clinton.”

I’m a woman and sadly, I agree with you.


57 posted on 02/11/2019 5:39:47 PM PST by tuffydoodle (God's character and moral nature are absolute, eternal, and unchanging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson