Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Pardon the intrusion, but 4runner
is correct on this. One needs to
focus on the word “jurisdiction”
and not “person” when it come to
interpretation of the 14th amendment.


20 posted on 02/28/2019 1:07:21 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Lean-Right
One needs to focus on the word “jurisdiction”

Agreed. Excellent point. One which I felt would come up in further discussion, if any.
Now...a definition seems to be in order. Which definition would fit the 14th?

Jurisdiction: Noun

- The official power to make legal decisions and judgments.
"federal courts had no jurisdiction over the case"

- the extent of the power to make legal decisions and judgments.
"the claim will be within the jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal"

- a system of law courts; a judicature.
"in some jurisdictions there is a mandatory death sentence for murder"

- the territory or sphere of activity over which the legal authority of a court or other institution extends.

The way I interpret the 14th, the last example seems the most appropriate given that the Constitution was a pact between the geographically dispersed states that existed at the time and formed the Unites States of America.

22 posted on 03/01/2019 5:24:52 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Atrophy of science is visible when the spokesman goes from Einstein to Sagan to Neil Degrasse Tyson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson