Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wastoute
Hopefully, your comment is simply bait.

Two things to remember: Barr was under oath when he made his statement about Mueller's response when asked why Mueller didn't indict. Barr is specific: he stated he asked Mueller three times whether the DoJ guidelines about not indicting a sitting President influenced Mueller's decision to NOT indict, and Mueller's answer was No all three times.
Barr was under oath.
Mueller was NOT under oath yesterday when he blatantly contradicted Barr.
Second thing. Barr would just as soon indict Trump as not. He is no Trump fan-boy.

Now that Trump has given Barr full authority to declassify, we'll see how serious Barr is. My money says Barr is very serious.
39 posted on 05/30/2019 5:46:15 AM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Montana_Sam

Be serious. Barr is very well aware the damage Watergate did to the GOP. It took a generation to even begin to recover. I’m sure that Barr is well aware what has been done is MUCH worse and if he were to do what you beleive he will it could damage the Democrats irreparably. I doubt he will do that.


44 posted on 05/30/2019 5:50:55 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson