I am not quite understanding your point-
if the national party is providing the funding, then the national party is going to have the say in who they fund
If Moore doesn’t need funding from the national party, he can tell them to F- off.
them that pays the piper calls the tunes.
I do not understand why my point is hard to follow. Moore was nominated, and the National party began funding him.
When the lying bitches made their false accusations against Moore, the National party immediately yanked all his funding without any due process. On mere accusations they pulled all his funding.
Yes, they have a right to fund who they like, but doesn't a man have a right to "due process"? When that lying bitch "Christina Blassey Ford" accused Brett Kavanaugh of assaulting her, did the Republican party say "Oh Well! He's guilty, so let's cut him off at the knees!"
No they did not. They brought in people to refute this woman and question her story, which was ultimately shown to be a whole lot of bullsh*t.
So what does it mean when the National party drops you over mere accusations? It means that they regard you as guilty, and therefore unworthy to be a candidate.
What effect does this have on your election chances? It wrecks h3ll out of them!
The party should have taken no action other than to issue the statement that until the matter is adjudicated, the man is presumed innocent.
Pulling his funding sent the immediate message that the National party regarded him as guilty, and on flimsy trumped up claims by two women of bad credibility.