Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Obama ‘add more jobs’ than POTUS Trump? Yes, BUT…
The National Sentinel ^ | 7/15/19 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 07/15/2019 12:12:43 PM PDT by SleeperCatcher

Writing in Forbes earlier this month, Chuck Jones, who covers technology, the global economy and the stock market as a contributor, made somewhat of a controversial claim: Though POTUS Donald Trump is earning high praise for his jobs-friendly economic policies, President Obama actually added more jobs to the economy than the current commander-in-chief.

Specifically, Jones notes:

Trump entered office on January 20, 2017, and starting with February 2017 he has been President for 29 months. Total job growth during that time has been 5.613 million or 194,000 per month with those results being helped by the tax cut.

Working back from January 2017, Obama’s last month in office, there had been 6.423 million jobs added or 221,000 per month. The difference for the 29 months is 810,000 more jobs or 27,000 more per month than Trump.

Note that back in January this year the total difference was only 194,000, which means over the past five months it has increased by 616,000. And looking at the next six months with Obama’s job numbers of 188,000 to 327,000 per month, the gap should only increase and cross 1 million.

So, Obama was the ‘jobs president,’ according to Jones — right?

Yes…and no. Jones is technically correct but let’s put his claims in context.

First of all, when Obama took office the U.S. economy was shedding jobs fast as the housing and financial markets were melting down. Shortly after he took office, total unemployment around the country soared past 10 percent.

When Trump won and when he officially took office, the unemployment rate had improved to 4.7 percent. Pretty good, but even a dive into those figures reveals that the job situation in America wasn’t anything like it is now.

For one, according to a December 2016 study by Harvard and Princeton universities, an astounding 94 percent of all 10 million new jobs created during Obama’s eight years in office were temporary positions:

The study shows that the jobs were temporary, contract positions, or part-time “gig” jobs in a variety of fields.

Female workers suffered most heavily in this economy, as work in traditionally feminine fields, like education and medicine, declined during the era.

The research by economists Lawrence Katz of Harvard University and Alan Krueger at Princeton University shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.

Under Obama, 1 million fewer workers, overall, are working than before the beginning of the Great Recession.

Since POTUS Trump took office, the unemployment rate has hovered around 4 percent and even below that, leading economists to note that the country is now essentially at full employment. And the jobs are much better — they are full-time, they pay better on average, and all demographics — whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians — are employed at record numbers under this president than under the last one.

As Matt Palumbo at Bongino.com notes:

…[T]he Trump economy is so strong that the unemployment rate is below what the estimated minimum unemployment rate is. The St. Louis Federal Reserve calculates that the natural rate of unemployment is currently 4.6%, while the actual unemployment rate (as of June) is 3.6%. Because the unemployment rate is already below its theoretical minimum, we can essentially only add more jobs each month consistent with population growth (or proportional to the labor force participation rate increasing).

Or to give an impossible hypothetical to illustrate this point further; if the Trump economy were to be at the point where every single person was employed, nobody needed to change jobs, and there was no population growth, there would be zero jobs added per month, but that wouldn’t be reflective of economic weakness (quite the opposite).

Also:

-- Entrepreneurship is great again, with over 150,000 more business applications being filed each quarter over trend.

-- Investment in small businesses is $300 billion higher than we would’ve seen had the trend Obama set continued (as of September 2018).

-- Blue collar employment would’ve declined had it continued its Obama-era trend. Instead, it’s grown and broken that trend Obama set. Blue collar employment is growing at the fastest rate since 1984.

-- And as the economy booms, not only are the unemployed finding work, those who previously gave up looking for work are reentering the labor force. As they enter the labor force, they’re easily finding jobs, since there are more job openings today than unemployed people.

And in terms of overall wealth, Americans are worth more today than when Obama left office, thanks to the historic rise in the stock market, where tens of millions of Americans have retirement accounts.

Obama never saw a single quarter of economic growth of 3 percent. It took POTUS Trump exactly two quarters in office to achieve that level.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; employment; jobcreation; presidentobama; presidentrump; stats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2019 12:12:43 PM PDT by SleeperCatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Bttt


2 posted on 07/15/2019 12:15:30 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

This is just part of the ground work for Biden to claim he and Obama are responsible for the current economy.


3 posted on 07/15/2019 12:15:35 PM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Hell no!


4 posted on 07/15/2019 12:18:46 PM PDT by TauntedTiger (Political correctness analyst/expert/victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher
Using the start date and end date for jobs is disingenuous anyway. A better metric is "average employed." Obama started at the very nadir of the economic cycle and thus had the easiest job creation metrics to do since FDR. Additionally, Obama had the most accomodative Fed Reserve - EVER - for his entire presidency. Most of his jobs were also part time in nature.

Trump started at the very PEAK of an economic cycle and has still managed extremely strong job #s, and that's in the face a fed reserve that raised rates 8 times and reversed QE by $500 billion in his first two years.

5 posted on 07/15/2019 12:19:16 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

No, only governmental jobs grew; those should not count.


6 posted on 07/15/2019 12:26:58 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Vote for President Trump in 2020 or end up equally miserable, no rights, and eating zoo animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

The economy started improving the minute Trump was elected and business optimism returned to the United States.


7 posted on 07/15/2019 12:27:56 PM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
No, only governmental jobs grew; those should not count.

Good point.

8 posted on 07/15/2019 12:29:20 PM PDT by libertylover (Democrats hated Lincoln too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Lies, damn lies and statistics


9 posted on 07/15/2019 12:36:28 PM PDT by con-surf-ative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider
I started my own business in October 2016. I wasn’t even expecting Trump to win. Something about the guy’s energy and enthusiasm just rubbed off on me, so I left a lucrative job in a stifling, bureaucratic company that just stunk like the Obama administration from the inside out.

I’ve never looked back, and I can say with 100% certainty that Donald Trump has been transformational for my business — mainly because he’s been transformational for MY CLIENTS.

10 posted on 07/15/2019 12:43:39 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher
What a joke, Forbes' Chuck Jones is. Under the 0's economy, I and some friends of mine had to work extra jobs to help with the bills or work with extra duties due to cut backs. I see a much more vibrancy and positive energy in how people are acting and reacting under Trump's economy.

Dems are doing what Dems do best. Deny and reflect/deflect their own failures, and leech on and lay claim the success of those who actually get things done.
11 posted on 07/15/2019 12:45:05 PM PDT by hawaiianninja (Palm note to self: "Trump/Pence -- Making America Great Again Since 2017!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher
Figures lie, and liers figure. Sounds like twisted figuring Bullshit to me 🐂💩.
12 posted on 07/15/2019 12:46:58 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher
The comparison has a major gap IMO...

Trump entered office on January 20, 2017, and starting with February 2017 he has been President for 29 months.

...

Working back from January 2017, Obama’s last month in office,

So, why is the comparison of Obama's last 27 months to Trumps first 27 months? (if I'm reading that correctly 'working back from Jan 2017"'). This is, as stated above, absolutely Damn Lies and Statistics.

13 posted on 07/15/2019 12:48:28 PM PDT by RedWing9 (Jesus Rocks Zero Sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Obie’s Uber Economy...BFD.


14 posted on 07/15/2019 12:50:46 PM PDT by rfp1234 (NBC: Putting the TURD in Saturday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damper99

This is just part of the ground work for Biden to claim he and Obama are responsible for the current economy.

***********************************************************

Article is not favorable to Obama.


15 posted on 07/15/2019 1:09:44 PM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

When pro union, greenie, pro lawyer, arch leftist 0bama got elected in Nov 08, employers started letting go of people to the tune of about 600k per month.

These losses were blamed on bush who had less than 3 months left in office.


16 posted on 07/15/2019 1:22:46 PM PDT by Ceebass (The only thing Orwell got wrong was the date)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Maybe in Iran.


17 posted on 07/15/2019 1:26:31 PM PDT by DungeonMaster (Prov 24: Do not fret because of evildoers. Do not associate with those given to change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

The best proxy for improved economy would be based on how much income is being taxed at the federal level.

Otherwise, a job as a barista counts the same as a job as a brain surgeon. Clearly, the relative worth added to the economy is quite different, and that difference would be reflected in the difference in incomes.


18 posted on 07/15/2019 1:30:14 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

The best proxy for improved economy would be based on how much income is being taxed at the federal level.

Otherwise, a job as a barista counts the same as a job as a brain surgeon. Clearly, the relative worth added to the economy is quite different, and that difference would be reflected in the difference in incomes.


19 posted on 07/15/2019 1:31:07 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

There was a pretty massive wealth transfer occurring at the same time as the Greatest Generation passed and their Boomer children sold their over priced homes and a lot of them retired early.

All of these employment numbers for the past eight years or so needs to be normalized against the change in demographics. Yes, as a percentage there are a ton of Americans working today. But how many households are there with early retired Boomers? That number has to be greater than previous generations.

This is not a reflection on anyone’s generation—but there are a lot of Boomers who, as they turn 70 are finally bailing out of the workforce—as well as those who took their parent’s inheritance and retired early.


20 posted on 07/15/2019 1:42:44 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson