Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Must Stop The Erosion Of Patent Rights
Townhall.com ^ | August 22, 2019 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 08/22/2019 7:01:52 AM PDT by Kaslin

In the decade prior to President Trump taking office, the decline of America’s patent system seemed inevitable and irreversible. Years of bad public policy championed in the halls of Congress, disastrous Supreme Court decisions, and misguided administrative rulings emanating from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had accelerated the erosion of intellectual property rights and jeopardized America’s position as the global innovation leader.

The United States was the undisputed beacon of innovation until its recent, marked and alarming slip. Now, less than three years into the Trump administration, the tide is turning. With key administration positions being filled with pro-patent officials, the United States is signaling a new day in intellectual property protection for America’s inventors.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Intellectual Property Center released its annual International IP Index and found that the United States had risen from 12thin patent system strength to a tenuous but encouraging 11-way tie for 2ndjust below Singapore. In Bloomberg’s annual Innovation Index, the United States moved up to 8thfrom 11thin their rankings released in January. These signs are encouraging but we must continue the progress to reclaim our status as the global hub for innovation.

The improved climate can be tied to the arrival of officials in key positions who support strong IP and patent protections.  This is especially true of President Trump’s appointee to head the Patent and Trademark Office, Andre Iancu.  Iancu has taken many important steps to implement changes at the PTO that strengthen the rights of patent holders and reverse the anti-patent bias.

Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, a bipartisan group of Senators and Congressmen is carrying the torch for innovators.  Recently my fellow Ohioan Rep. Steve Stivers (R-OH) and Rep. Bill Foster (D-IL), as well as Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) re-introduced the STRONGER Patents Act of 2019 in their respective chambers. It’s heartening to see members of Congress take the lead and advance serious permanent strengthening of the patent system. Several key conservative organizations have already cheered the introduction of this legislation.

Perhaps the most encouraging part of this legislation is that it reins in the administrative tribunal known as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).  The PTAB was created by the American Invents Act, signed into law by President Obama.  The tribunal, run by the PTO, was intended to bring efficiency to patent challenges  Instead it has become known as the “patent death squad” which has tormented patent owners for years, showing utter disdain (or inexplicable ignorance at a minimum) for the innovative process and costing America’s inventors time and untold sums defending their intellectual property from hostile and repeated challenges by infringers. By some estimates, the PTAB invalidates over 75% of patents issued by the USPTO. 

The tribunal’s review doesn’t offer patent owners the same legal procedural protections and standards of proof as a court of law, and the tribunal can invalidate any patent challenged at will.  Many inventors have found themselves successfully defending their patent in federal court, only to have it later invalidated at the PTAB – where the standards are much different.  Fortunately, Director Iancu has started to reform the process and make sure that the claim standards are the same as the ones used by federal courts.

While those changes are critical, it is not enough.  Rule changes by the PTO director can be easily reversed, so those changes must be permanent.  Fortunately, the STRONGER Patents Act would do just that, and provide much-needed guidance, clarity, and fairness to the proceedings.

Another key component of this legislation is that it reestablishes that“patents are property rights, enforceable with injunctions.” If a patent owner cannot get an injunction against an infringer, they essentially have no property rights protection.  Strengthening those protections puts patent thieves on notice that they can’t wait out inventors with long, protracted litigation while continuing to sell products using someone else’s ideas.  This change will encourage negotiations licensing agreements.

After years of decline, I’m encouraged by the recent action of our policymakers to stem the tide of erosion in patent rights. For too long, while our leaders dismantled our patent system, countries in Europe and Asia (even China) have worked aggressively to buttress their patent systems modeled after the one we enshrined in our constitution at the founding. Now, President Trump and a bipartisan cadre of senators and congressmen are taking action to make America once again a nation that protects patent rights, encourages innovation, and leads the world in technological advancement. And this should encourage us all.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: congress

1 posted on 08/22/2019 7:01:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess my patent on selling goods for money is in jeopardy....


2 posted on 08/22/2019 7:09:59 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

My copyright for the word “the” looks in jeopardy also.


3 posted on 08/22/2019 7:12:35 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Heaven has gates, walls and immigration policy but Hell has an open border policy. Food for thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just one more infliction dorkbama perpetrated against the American people.


4 posted on 08/22/2019 7:12:37 AM PDT by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would suggest that the biggest threat to patents is governments effectively eliminating them on drugs by imposing price controls or allowing foreign governments to circumvent them. Patents are meaningless if those holding them can’t set their own prices.

That being said, a case can be made that some patents were too broad, involving no inventive effort and being merely commonsense applications of new ideas.


5 posted on 08/22/2019 7:25:59 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adical Islam,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
I guess my patent on selling goods for money is in jeopardy....

The Patent Examiners will believe almost anything.

I have worked on several projects where we filed for patents. It was an eye-opener to be sure.

My own assessment is that the system has been extensively gamed by predatory lawyers and is a major barrier to real innovations. The main reason to file patents is to prevent extortion from boutique law firms which get a patent on the word "AND" then sue medium-sized companies so they can demand settlement payments.

Larger companies will file shotgun applications aimed at everything that is not nailed down. Mostly, they make "peace treaties" with peer competitors and cross-license all the non-critical stuff.

Amazon was recently awarded a patent for photographing products on a white background.

6 posted on 08/22/2019 8:59:57 AM PDT by flamberge (The wheels keep turning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

The patent on amusing a cat with a laser pointer is still up:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5443036A/en

You can’t make these things up....or maybe you can!


7 posted on 08/22/2019 9:52:38 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would recommend highly the documentary “INVALIDATED” The Shredding of the US Patent System. Here is a link to the trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thaqlchX0mE

Available on Amazon.

I met Josh Malone, the inventor of Bunch ‘o Balloons and it was shocking what happened to him and others. The PTAB system is outright evil and is designed to allow big companies to steal our intellectual property.


8 posted on 08/22/2019 10:19:53 AM PDT by Feynman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
So is playing DVDs and other media with protected multimedia codecs legal in America now under Windows or Linux (MP3 is i think)? I know the VLC player (for one) will play most all formats, and the Windows Store offers a free DVD player, and you can buy one from fluendo for Linux and Windows (separate licenses though).
9 posted on 08/24/2019 3:51:08 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson