[Alberta's Child]

The relevance of this is that Uber is opposed to the new California law, and one of the arguments they've made is that they're a company that's not really involved in "passenger transportation."

And yet they classified themselves as a "Taxicab" company in the corporate documents they filed when they established the company.

Are they lying now, or did they file fraudulent paperwork when they established the company?

[lasereye]

That observation has nothing whatsoever to do with the points raised in the article.

Further, I would say they’re not a taxicab company. A taxicab company owns cabs, for starters.

What about Lyft? Did they also classify themselves as a taxicab company? If this big point of yours actually means something, and it doesn’t, then that would mean the law doesn’t apply to Lyft.