Posted on 10/11/2019 6:45:12 AM PDT by Jagermonster
3. If Hunter Biden’s role wasn’t illegal, was it ethical?
It was not ethical, according to Sarah Chayes, author of “Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security.” In an Atlantic opinion piece, she suggests that Burisma was using the Biden name to scrub its reputation and Hunter Biden was cashing in. She sees the Ukraine case as an example of a global culture of U.S. “consultants” – including former Obama and Bush officials – being paid large sums to help legitimize theft, by “trading on their connections and their access to insider policy information – usually by providing services to kleptocrats...,” she writes.
No evidence?
Does that include his bragging about it on camera?
Slow Joe never was that bright.
Holds steady? By what measure? He’s sinking like a rock
Uh, what impeachment. No vote, no inquiry, no subpoenas. Squat of get off the pot nan.
Slow and Steady?
Slow and Steady?
After watching the Glenn Beck video on the whole affair, I am likely to see more worthy insight by reading through the phone book than from a place like the Christian Science Monitor.
Fake news for the mentally disabled voters, the dems.
Archives: Joe Biden bows out of 1988 presidential race ---Joe Biden abandoned his candidacy for the president
in 1988 after an outcry over allegations of plagiarism. delawareonline.com
Joe Biden lied in 1987 during his first run for the Oval Office claiming he marched in the Civil Rights Movement--
something he never did. breitbart.com
It is maddening that so-called journalists publish such tripe. The criminal is on videotape bragging and confessing. Yet the media waves it all away and says “no evidence”.
Meanwhile, of course, Trump, Kavanaugh, and all other Republicans are guilty until proven innocent.
There IS NO EVIDENCE of any corruption or malfeasance in the obama administration. It was absolutely scandalous free....
wanna buy a bridge?
“ There’s no evidence that the Bidens did anything illegal in Ukraine.”
That’s the frigging problem.
L
Citizen, we of the enlightened Royal Media will tell you what is evidence and what is not evidence.
Next. ;-)
Ah, the Christian Science Monitor.....Reliably liberal since the early 60’s.
History repeats itself.
I’ve said for 40 years that just because something is legal, doesn’t make it moral. And, conversely, just because something is illegal, doesn’t make it immoral.
The laws are arbitrary. Some are tied directly to morality, but many are not. And they can get us into trouble when applied in a “one size fits all” fashion.
An example: In my state it is illegal to have an “opened” alcohol container in your car. However, I had a bag of glass containers in my car to take to the recycling center. One of them is a big Costco Scotch bottle. There is even still scotch in the bottle - a drop or three coating the glass inside.
I’m breaking the law by doing that. But am I breaking the spirit of the law? Absolutely not. Nevertheless, if I’m pulled over by a local cop that really hates me, and he sees that bottle sticking out of the bag, I’m in big trouble.
On a side note, this is how I see this three year impeachment farce.
No evidence..as if.
I hadn’t realized CSM is just another Rat tool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
