“Your defense of the police action in this specific instance is a defense of an armed state’s power to use their weapons of war however the state pleases, without any fear of judicial restraint or popular resistance.”
You lie worse than Schiff!
“You lie worse than Schiff!”
I don’t even understand what this means.
Are you saying Constitutionalists are lying about what’s in the Constitution?
Or are you saying Constitutionalists are worse than Schiff?
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt by suggesting an increasingly evident (in your successive posts) likelihood: you are perhaps unaware of, or incapable of grasping, what the Constitution says or what it means, and how those principals apply to this scenario.
And you seem to assume that supporting the cops, no matter what they do or how they do it— collateral damage to innocent bystanders or their property be damned— is automatically some kind of conservative stance.
It ain’t, FRiend.